Romain Bardou wrote:
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Romain Bardou wrote:
Hello, dear Caml-list,
I have a file ast.mli. It has no .ml implementation as it contains only
type definitions.
Then you should name that file ast.ml. Last time I tested (more than a
year ago) n ast.ml file without corresponding ast.mli file is handled as
if ast.mli was the output of ocamlc -i ast.ml.
Regards
Yes, this seems to be the easiest way. It's too bad that this implies
having a .cmo to link against just for some type definitions, though.
Why is that bad? The *.cm[oi] files are the only ones containing the processed type & module information, and we
obviously don't want ocamlc to reparse ast.mli each time it is needed.
Regards
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
