Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > Romain Bardou wrote: >> Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: >>> Romain Bardou wrote: >>>> Hello, dear Caml-list, >>>> >>>> I have a file ast.mli. It has no .ml implementation as it contains only >>>> type definitions. >>> >>> Then you should name that file ast.ml. Last time I tested (more than a >>> year ago) n ast.ml file without corresponding ast.mli file is handled as >>> if ast.mli was the output of ocamlc -i ast.ml. >>> >>> Regards >> >> Yes, this seems to be the easiest way. It's too bad that this implies >> having a .cmo to link against just for some type definitions, though. > > > Why is that bad? The *.cm[oi] files are the only ones containing the > processed type & module information, and we obviously don't want ocamlc > to reparse ast.mli each time it is needed.
Indeed, but a .cmi would be enough :) Cheers, -- Romain Bardou _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
