yes.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:25:52AM -0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
> I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other 
> behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem!
> 
> Cheers,
> Jon.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-
> > boun...@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Christophe Raffalli
> > Sent: 29 November 2010 07:33
> > To: oli...@first.in-berlin.de
> > Cc: Caml List
> > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast?
> > 
> > Le 28/11/2010 19:17, oli...@first.in-berlin.de a écrit :
> > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:58:55PM +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>> To the extent that this rule is the same for all languages and that
> > most
> > >>> languages on the shootout are also garbage collected, I think
> > OCaml's
> > >>> problem with this benchmark do point at a weakness of the current
> > >>> GC code.
> > >> This is untrue ... the bintree example, is just bad in OCaml because
> > the
> > >> default
> > >> value of the minor heap size is the correct value for reactive
> > programs
> > >> where you want fast minor GC slice, because they interrupt the
> > program ...
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > And if your program contains both kinds of functionality?
> > > What possible solution would you recommend?
> > 
> > Changing the value of the minor heap size at runtime ...
> > There is no pb with this ...
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > >    Oliver
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> > > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> > > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> > > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> > > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> > 
> > --
> > Christophe Raffalli
> > Universite de Savoie
> > Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21
> > 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex
> > 
> > tel: (33) 4 79 75 81 03
> > fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42
> > mail: christophe.raffa...@univ-savoie.fr
> > www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME
> > At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution
> > can check this signature. The public key is
> > stored on www.keyserver.net
> > ---------------------------------------------
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

Reply via email to