* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will
receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you
to keep pace with the changes in the markets.  Bonner and
I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the
two letters will reinforce each other.
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Great Disconnect

The Daily Reckoning

London, England

Thursday, September 23, 2004

---------------------

*** The "bankruptcy" economy... the steel industry... how
can 
GM compete?

*** Fannie Mae stock drops 7% on SEC investigation... 

*** The Dutch Antilles... hurricane damage... not 
voting... and a disgusted reader!
        
--- Advertisement ---

Only 4 Days Left!

12 of My Last 13 Picks Have Been Winners 

By November 1, 2004, My MST System Promises to Make You
4.6 Times Richer 

OR YOUR MONEY BACK!

Since February 24th, 2004 my readers have received 13
trade
recommendations - 12 have been winners. That's a 92%
accuracy
rate. And the gains have come in only days - hours in some
cases.

Take a look at the results for yourself...  and get $100
off!...  

Hurry...  Only 4 days left before this offer expires

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/MST/special915

---------------------


Watch those long bonds! Instead of going down with higher 
interest and higher inflation rates, they're going up.
They're telling us to beware... 

George W. Bush tells us that the economy is strengthening 
and Iraq is on the road to peace and ballot boxes. He 
appears to be wrong on both points.

Yesterday, the Dow seemed to notice. It slipped toward 
10,000 - again.

And all over the country, people are having trouble keeping 

up with their obligations. 

The city of San Diego has $1.2 billion in pension benefits

it can't seem to cover.

General Motors has a glut of unsold 2004 models - so many 
it is offering 0% financing for six years to get rid of 
them. But it also owes so much in pension and health care 
costs for its employees it is almost impossible for the 
company to ever make any money. Over at Honda, each car 
costs the company $107 in pension and health care costs. 
But at GM, the cost is $1,360. You can imagine what the 
cost is for Chinese manufacturers. How can GM compete? How

can it stay in business? 

What do you do when you get in this situation?

"Welcome to the bankruptcy economy," says Jim Jubak over at 

TheStreet.com. You cut prices... forced by competition, of

course... but you can't cut your costs - especially the 
promises you've made to employees. Then, you declare 
bankruptcy. What else can you do?

Delta and US Airways, for example, were greased up by the 
bankruptcy courts and are now wiggling out of their 
obligations to pilots.

The steel industry, says Jubak, showed the way. Nucor, for

example, "employs far fewer steelworkers at far lower total 

wage and benefit costs than it did in 1975." 

Go bankrupt. Cut costs. Cut payrolls. Cut spending. 

Not something to look forward to. But something to expect.

More news, from our man in the action:

--------------  

Eric Fry, from Wall Street... 

- Fannie Mae got caught with her hand in the cookie 
jar... so investors spanked every kid in the house. Fannie

Mae shares tumbled more than $5 yesterday, forcing the 
entire stock market to share her pain. Today, they fell 
another $1.70, or 2.4%, shortly after open. Crude oil also

took a few whacks at the market's behind, by jumping $1.59, 

to $48.35 a barrel. Once all the wailing and sobbing had 
subsided, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was nursing a 
painful 135-point loss to 10,109, while the Nasdaq was 35 
points lower at 1,886.

- Apparently, Fannie Mae is not the squeaky clean, do-
gooder that the well-compensated officers of the company 
purport her to be. This sly vixen has been up to no good, 
according to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise 
Oversight. After eight months of peeking under Fannie's 
skirt, OFHEO published its findings yesterday... and what 
findings they were!

- OFHEO informed Fannie Mae's chagrined board of directors

that, on at least one occasion, company executives had 
deferred expenses in order to meet executive bonus targets, 

while also dipping into improper "cookie jar" reserves to 
boost reported earnings. The report also criticized a 
corporate culture "that emphasized stable earnings at the 
expense of accurate financial disclosures."

- OFHEO insists that its findings "are serious and raise 
doubts concerning the validity of previously reported 
financial results, the adequacy of regulatory capital, the

quality of management supervision and the [company's] 
overall safety and soundness."

- Fannie Mae's shares tumbled 7%, as if the findings were a 

complete surprise... they weren't. For many years, rumors
of 
accounting impropriety have been swirling around this 
company like flies around a cow's flank. Many professional

short-sellers known to your New York editor have been 
betting against this stock - unprofitably - on the idea 
that the company's impossibly steady earnings growth is 
exactly that: impossible.

- Thanks to the insights of these astute investors, your 
editor remarked one year ago (Aug. 14, 2003, to be exact) 
in this column: "Imagine a parent who stores crates of 
explosives under his baby's crib and you will understand 
something about Fannie Mae's approximate financial profile. 

Now imagine that the parents slide the baby's crib and 
explosives over next to the radiator (in order to make room 

for more explosives) and you will understand something 
about Fannie Mae's corporate philosophy... "

- But even those folks who do not read The Daily Reckoning

every day - we call them "infidels" - should have suspected 

something ill-becoming at Fannie Mae. Didn't kindred spirit 

Freddie Mac admit last year to "smoothing" earnings? And 
wasn't this confession the trigger for OFHEO's inquiry into 

Fannie Mae? And weren't Fannie Mae's earnings as impossibly 

smooth as Freddie Mac's? Hmmm... curious.

- Now that the OFHEO report has piqued the public's 
interest, federal regulators are lining up to take a peek 
at Fannie's private parts. The SEC is first in 
line... perhaps the Fannie Mae saga is closer to its 
beginning than to its "unhappily ever after."

- While Fannie Mae shareholders were licking their wounds 
yesterday, crude oil investors were rubbing their 
eyes... The Energy Department reported a stunning 9.1 
million-barrel drop in crude inventories for the week ended 

Sept. 17 - the eighth-straight weekly decline. Separately,

the American Petroleum Institute pegged the size of the 
week's crude drawdown at a huge 12.9 million barrels. Both

organizations reported total inventories at 266.7 million 
barrels - the lowest level since early February, and close

to the lowest level in 28 years.

- Since Hurricane Ivan brought oil importation to a halt in 

the Gulf of Mexico last week, refineries and other crude 
oil consumers had no choice but to dip into existing 
stockpiles. The news of falling inventories sent oil prices 

soaring to near-record levels, which also triggered 
sympathetic rallies in unleaded gasoline, heating oil and 
natural gas.

- "The Gulf Coast needs to pray they don't get any more 
hurricanes or tropical storm disruptions, or all bets are 
off," says Kevin Kerr, editor of Resource Trader Alert. As

Kevin's subscribers are profitably aware, Kevin has been, 
and continues to be, an ardent bull toward almost every 
product in the energy complex. He recently closed out a 
profitable trade on heating oil and is shifting his focus 
now to the natural gas market. "Gas prices will rise sooner 

and sharper than most folks expect," the energy expert 
predicts.

- October natural gas rose 5.7 cents yesterday, to $5.665 
per million British thermal units, capping a three-day, 20% 

rally for the "clean fuel."

--------------

Bill Bonner, back in London... 

*** Fannie Mae shares crashed 7% yesterday. "Regulators 
have found serious accounting problems at mortgage giant 
Fannie Mae, prompting an inquiry by the Securities and 
Exchange Commission and calling into question its financial 

soundness," said Yahoo.

Chris Mayer, Fleet Street editor, sends this comment...  

"This was bound to happen. The most aggressive of lenders,

along with Freddie Mac, has swallowed about half of the 
U.S. mortgage market. Now we find out Fannie has been 
fudging on its earnings. What else are they fudging on? For 

years, Fannie has maintained that its book is adequately 
hedged against a rise in interest rates. Maybe they
aren't.

You know, Fannie rolls over something like $30 billion in 
debt per week. Imagine if the market didn't want Fannie's 
paper as much because of concerns over its 
creditworthiness? Rates would have to rise to compensate 
for the added risk and Fannie's cost of borrowing goes up - 

further exacerbating the problem. Given Fannie's high 
leverage (they have something like a 3% capital position -

not including off-balance sheet stuff), they don't have a 
lot of cushion to fall back on.

Well, they do have the U.S. government (read: the U.S. 
taxpayer). But, we all know the U.S. government does not 
guarantee Fannie's debt, right? (wink, wink).

*** The electronic mailbag continues to overflow:

Here's a note from a reader in the Dutch Antilles!

"I wanted to offer support to your stance on gay marriage.

I wholeheartedly agree with you and knew your comments 
would draw serious flak. This is, though, the reason why I

read your e-mail; I want to read something that very few 
will dare write. 

"As it's popular to say in the United States, 'I'm lovin' 
it'... keep it coming."

*** A comment on hurricane damage... 
 
"I'm sick of reading how the Florida hurricanes are going 
to help the economy in the long run. How stupid. But if 
it's somehow true that a catastrophe like this is good for

the economy, then I think I have a great idea to save a lot 

of money. How about we abandon all our anti-terrorist 
activities worldwide? That would save about $85 billion in

Iraq alone. Then we do away with all this airport security

crap and save another bundle. Then when the terrorists 
start blowing up targets around the country, there will be

a great stimulus of the economy as we rebuild. It seems 
like a win-win situation."

*** And voting... 
 
"My only purpose in writing today is to beg you to vote, 
despite our deplorable choices, because that most important 

privilege - freedom of speech - will not fare equally under 

Bush and Kerry administrations - see Mogambo's notes re the 

importance of lying!
 
"If Bush stays in - which looks inevitable - human rights 
worldwide will be diminished, a woman's right to choose 
outlawed and our international allies convinced we're 
behind that moron!
 
"You just THINK you don't have a dog in this fight!!!"

*** And voting for third parties... 

"I am completely *disgusted* with your conclusion not to 
vote based on only two selections - Bush and Kerry."

"What about other party candidates? Personally, I will be 
voting for Michael Badnarik of the Libertarian Party. He 
stands for free markets, much smaller government and 
minding our own business in foreign affairs. That's what 
you guys espouse on a daily basis.
 
"You don't have to endorse him, but just think of the 
contribution you could make to America if you at least 
acknowledged the existence of other party candidates and 
how they might stack up against the principles you stand 
for!

"Even if someone like Badnarik received only 2% of the 
vote, it could signal a coming wave of real voter 
disenchantment (as opposed to your complete apathy) that 
might, just might, begin to change the hopeless policies of 

our two default parties. Default - there's a good financial 

choice of words!

"Please don't advocate not voting. Instead, advocate voting 

for a third-party candidate!

*** And on marriage... 

"As to marriage being 'the work of the gods, of Nature...
of 
God himself,' I believe marriage was an institution 
contrived by tribal people to maintain order in the tribe 
and to 'possibly' prevent other male tribal members 
stealing one another's women, although there have been 
several cultures in which tribal members enthusiastically 
shared their women with one another, and apparently quite 
happily so.
 
"I would assume this cut down considerably on the divorce 
rate and much male physical conflict if everyone was 
'getting some.'
 
"As far as this 'God' Bill speaks of is concerned, if (he,

she, it) created any of this earthly mess, I simply cannot

see the logic or plan to it, unless it was to punish every

living thing higher on the evolutionary scale than a 
gorilla, to show them that this was one project (he, she, 
it) totally screwed up.
 
"It appears that the 'works of man' will in some way soon 
decimate the Earth and its beings in such a way as to set 
the program back a few million years so it can get a new 
foothold on a more productive path. Perhaps by just 
stopping with plant life and leaving the crawly, swimmy, 
flying things out of the picture in the next round."

--- Advertisement ---

Ralph�s Cancer was the worst case the Mayo Clinic had seen
in 20 years... 

Eight years ago, Ralph�s cancer was so bad...  they�d
given
him Last Rites. But a little known, non-drug therapy
brought
him back from the brink of death. Today, his doctors call
him...  The Miracle Man. Learn the natural secret that
saved
Ralph�s life after drugs, chemotherapy, and everything
else
in conventional medicine�s "bag of tricks" couldn't.

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/HSI/W6HSE907

---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: The stock market and the 
economy have diverged. So the fundamentals are not being 
valued correctly. Gary Shilling explains why there are so 
many parties with an interest in keeping it this way.


THE GREAT DISCONNECT
by Gary Shilling

Financial markets and the economy parted company in the 
late 1990s. With stock weakness this year in the face of a

strong economy and robust profits, the great disconnect 
still exists.

The unwinding of inflation in the 1980s and 1990s spawned 
the long 1982-2000 bull market by driving up P/Es and 
profits. By the late 1990s, its length and intensity put 
fear to flight, leaving nothing but intense greed. 
Speculation rivaled that of the late 1920s, and the 
subsequent revelations of Wall Street and corporate 
malfeasance take the parallels even closer.

So powerful was that 17-year, eight-month bull market that

even a three-year bear market - one which cut the Nasdaq 
index by 78% - was not strong enough to bring the financial 

and economic worlds back together. And massive monetary 
easing and huge fiscal stimuli actively promoted a 
continued separation. The nose dive in interest rates 
spurred housing and cash-out mortgage refinancing. Tax cuts 

and leaps in defense and homeland security spending pumped

big money into the economy.

As a result, financial speculation survived largely intact, 

but shifted from stocks to residential real estate and 
hedge funds. Those private partnerships - along with banks, 

brokers and other pools of capital - took advantage of 
cheap short-term money to invest in Treasury bonds, junk 
bonds, convertibles, emerging market stocks and bonds, 
currencies and commodities.

Evidence is rampant that financial markets remain in their

own levitated world. Sure, like most services, the 
financial sector grows faster than the overall economy. As

U.S. business expands, financial services become more 
widespread and more complex and make up an increasing share 

of economic activity. Still, the continuing upward 
departures from early, consistent post-World War II trends

testified to the persistent disconnect from the real 
economy. These intact bulges are significant since 
corrections of the huge 1990s speculations should have 
taken them below their long-term trends for at least a few

years.

The Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index contains almost all 
U.S. stocks, so its ratio to GDP gauges the stock market's

value relative to the economy. The ratio is well below its

2000 peak, but at 96% remains substantially above the
1971-
1996 trend projection that puts it at 60%. Similarly, 
mutual fund assets in relation to GDP now stand at 64%, 
well above the 54% dictated by the 1984-1996 trend line.

The financial services sector, of course, benefited from 
the stock surge in the late 1990s, and the market 
capitalization of the financial stocks in the S&P 500 index 

leaped to 18% of the total. But after a brief setback when

the market swooned, those companies were recharged by 
residential real estate and spread lending activity. So 
their market caps now account for more than 20% of the S&P

500 total. Meanwhile, the notional value of over-the-
counter derivatives such as currency and interest rate 
swaps climbed from $90 trillion at the end of 1999 to $197

trillion at the end of 2003.

Almost no one wants the financial and real estate spheres 
to reunite with the economic world, since the fusion could

be bloody. Not the speculators involved. Not the brokers, 
banks, hedge funds, money managers, venture capitalists, 
financial TV channels, consultants and purveyors of 
financial data and research that serve them. Not even the 
administration and the Fed.

History says the two worlds will rejoin sooner or later. 
Still, the Fed, whether it knows it or not, is trying to 
prevent just such a reunion. Here's why.

The Fed has already telegraphed its intentions to raise the 

federal funds rate it controls. Futures markets have so 
firmly anticipated future credit tightening that if the Fed 

does not proceed, it risks losing credibility - a no-no for 

the central bank.

But higher rates could be curtains for spread lenders and 
house prices. A serious financial crisis could turn my 
forecast of the good deflation of excess supply into the 
bad deflation of deficient demand as incomes are
shattered.

But suppose the Fed succeeds in raising interest rates 
slowly enough that speculators can adapt without major 
failures. Most would probably figure that Washington had 
again raised the safety net so they could climb to yet a 
higher perch from which to take that half-mile dive into a

wet sponge. They'd no doubt take even bigger speculative 
positions in real estate, commodities, stocks, junk bonds,

currencies, etc. The gap would widen and the prospects of 
closing it painlessly would fall.

Sadly, the Great Disconnect of the last decade between the

speculative financial and the real economic worlds will 
probably persist until a lot of people not only lose a lot

of money, but also give up all hope of being bailed out. 

Regards,

Gary Shilling 
for The Daily Reckoning

Editor's Note: Dr. Gary Shilling is president of A. Gary 
Shilling & Co. Inc., an investment advisory and economic 
consulting firm and publisher of the monthly INSIGHT 
newsletter.

Not only has Dr. Shilling beaten the stock market by a wide 

margin over many years, he has provided consistently 
accurate forecasts to his subscribers. Twice ranked as Wall 

Street's top economist by polls in Institutional Investor,

Dr. Shilling was also named the country's No. 1 commodity 
trader advisor by Futures magazine. And last year, 
MoneySense ranked him as the third-best stock market 
forecaster, right behind Warren Buffett.

A regular columnist for Forbes magazine, Gary Shilling 
appears frequently on radio and television business shows 
and has written six books, including Is Inflation Ending: 
Are You Ready? in 1983 and, more recently, two books 
detailing his forecast for the new world order and its 
consequences for your wallet. For his very latest research, 

see:

INSIGHT 
http://www.agaryshilling.com/insightdr.html


--- Advertisement ---

Twelve Chances at 100% Gains or Your Money Back!

Are you the type of investor who likes to pocket huge gains 
of 100%, 175%, 277% or 378%? 
If so, you'll be interested in what one options expert has
to say. Since 2000 he's been 
able to bring his subscribers at least 12 recommendations
per year that have reached gains 
or 100% or more!   And we're so convinced that he'll do the 
same over the next twelve months 
that we are guaranteeing that you'll see at least 12
chances at triple-digit gains -- or your 
money back. Learn more about this unbelievable guarantee.

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OHL/WOHLE703

------------------------------------------------------

MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board at
http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3
and submit your views or read what others are saying.
Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply with the word 'Question' or
'Comment' in the Subject of your e-mail.

------------------------------------------------------

If you'd like, please e-mail this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/emailfriend.cfm?id=10277

------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESS CHANGE? WISH TO CANCEL? You can administer your
account online. Simply go to Subscriber Services at:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/subsvcs.cfm

------------------------------------------------------


*******
Please note: We sent this e-mail to: 
     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed to this service.

*******
To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:
    http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=RealityC
To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:
    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705 USA

*******
Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice.
Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions,
they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular
investment situation.  No communication by our employees to you should be
deemed as personalized investment advice.

We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any
security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must
wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of
printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation.
Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after
consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the
prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Reply via email to