Nós estamos discutindo a quantidade de tempo feita exame acima por discussões da política em vez realmente de afixar o índice significativo. É você ativo em campanhas?
http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr Chad On 10/16/06, Caroline Mendes de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Não me mande mais essas mensagens pois eu não sei inglês, não entendo nada do que disse. Brian Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: There shouldn't be lasting decisions on policy in a site this small. And voting is not the only way to make a decision. I'm concerned we are goign to be stuck with policies that came through because of a couple of votes, and will be hard to get rid of when they become obsolete. On 10/11/06, Chad Lupkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without a doubt. It's taking up way too much time, and it's driving > people away. > > So, which of us on this list or of the people active on the wiki site > shall impose our view of how things should be run on everyone else? > Which of us shall be the boss over all content decisions? I'm not > willing to do that. I'm not willing to be "the boss". And I would > hope that none of us want to. > > What I'm trying to say is that this is how groups organize themselves. > We make decisions about rules of conduct, we discuss them and debate > them, and then we vote on those decisions. We have not established a > list of people who can present ideas, we've opened it up to everyone. > So we've had a lot of ideas. > > Why this is preventing us from building the site in other ways, I > don't know. I'm doing everything I have time to do. I think that's a > question of promotion more than anything else. > > Chad > > On 10/11/06, Brian Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There seems to be a lot of voting on policies on Campaigns Wikia at the > > moment. I have taken part in them all, but now I am wondering if it's such a > > good idea. > > > > First of all, this is still a small group. Around 7 people vote on a > > subject. Is counting "yes" or "no" votes the best way to resolve disputes? > > Surely with the numbers getting involved in policy debates, more dialogue is > > a better idea. > > > > Secondly, these are early days. Do we want policies which have been decided > > on by a tiny group of people (sometimes 2 or 3 votes approving of a policy > > can be all it takes to get it passed) to direct this community? Yes, they > > can be changed later (more voting!) but do we need to be setting them quite > > yet? > > > > Mopst people on this list aren't participating in these votes, why? Is it > > because you feel much the same way as I do? Are there too many votes on the > > wiki at the moment? > > _______________________________________________ > > Campaigns-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Campaigns-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l > _______________________________________________ Campaigns-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l ________________________________ O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha conferir! _______________________________________________ Campaigns-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
_______________________________________________ Campaigns-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/campaigns-l
