On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:34, Isak Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: >> My suggestion would be to make it Markaby 2.0 (of course, once it's >> running and mostly backwards-compatible), keeping the old gem name, >> and to develop on a branch in markaby repo. > > > Yeah, we should more or less do a rewrite and make it properly open source. > You are allowed to make something with the same name aren't you? I mean > there > is songs with the same names after all. > > So what we would have wouldn't exactly be Markaby but it would be used > exactly > like Markaby. We could make it smaller/faster and more up to date :)
Just so everyone knows: Camping doesn't depend on Markaby today. It's only loaded when you actually try to use it. Would you suggest that we switch to a hard dependency on Markaby, or should we continue what we're doing today? _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
