Stick with the way we're doing it. I only use markaby when it's easier/prettier to use then HAML (quick one-line helpers and the like).
Dave On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Magnus Holm <judo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:34, Isak Andersson <icepa...@lavabit.com> wrote: >>> My suggestion would be to make it Markaby 2.0 (of course, once it's >>> running and mostly backwards-compatible), keeping the old gem name, >>> and to develop on a branch in markaby repo. >> >> >> Yeah, we should more or less do a rewrite and make it properly open source. >> You are allowed to make something with the same name aren't you? I mean >> there >> is songs with the same names after all. >> >> So what we would have wouldn't exactly be Markaby but it would be used >> exactly >> like Markaby. We could make it smaller/faster and more up to date :) > > Just so everyone knows: Camping doesn't depend on Markaby today. It's > only loaded when you actually try to use it. Would you suggest that we > switch to a hard dependency on Markaby, or should we continue what > we're doing today? > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list -- Dave _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
