I agree, I'd like to see the way Camping works to grow in to something much
more usable. Perhaps a fork is a good idea because the legacy would remain and
all. But then in the fork we could deal with things that might be kind of
annoying at times. And grow it with a steady pace.
If we'd fork camping I think we should still stay as minimalistic as possible.
Only adding the best things. And work on making it easy to extend.
Cheers!
Isak Andersson
Dave Everitt <dever...@innotts.co.uk> skrev:
There's a crucial point here... if 3k (the old 4k) is a 'proof of concept' and
a great exercise in programming skill, it isn't something that most users will
really worry about. If the 3k limit has to be broken back up to 4 or even 5k to
get some added/altered/optional functionality that would help usability for the
rest of us, it's not an issue for me - DaveE
3kb is great and all, but it seems kind of dishonest if the framework isn't
even really usable without a bunch of other gems and files and stuff. The
conflict between 3/4kb and having robust well designed features often seems to
haunt this project. Maybe time for a forking? I have next to no interest in 3kb
as a real feature.
Get the best selection of online sites here. Click Here to check them
out!
http://click.lavabit.com/dijea1fjy66jdsnewkjgbtrhtydj4b1pdtfh1jbkrr736gayp7sb/
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
