On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:59, david costa <gurugeek...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all :) > I have been playing with Sinatra a lot lately and perhaps *some* things are > done easily there (URL mapping, static files) but being a DSL and not a > framework it is a bit different. For many things camping does the job very > well and overall I find it a more comprehensive solution than Sinatra. > > For the classic/new versions I think the issue would be if the main code > maintainer (Magnus) should decide if he is willing to do that. Of course > other people could do that too but it would still be two versions to > maintain or, if you are freezing camping-classic as it is it should at least > have a light maintenance that ensures that it would still works fine.
For now I'm feeling like a pretty bad "maintainer". I'm not using Camping enough to see where things need to be fixed, I'm crappy at actually shipping stuff, and I'm not sure if I believe that Camping is a correct starting point for a new framework. _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
