On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:59, david costa <gurugeek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all :)
> I have been playing with Sinatra a lot lately and perhaps *some* things are
> done easily there (URL mapping, static files) but being a DSL and not a
> framework it is a bit different. For many things camping does the job very
> well and overall I find it a more comprehensive solution than Sinatra.
>
> For the classic/new versions I think the issue would be if the main code
> maintainer (Magnus) should decide if he is willing to do that. Of course
> other people could do that too but it would still be two versions to
> maintain or, if you are freezing camping-classic as it is it should at least
> have a light maintenance that ensures that it would still works fine.

For now I'm feeling like a pretty bad "maintainer". I'm not using
Camping enough to see where things need to be fixed, I'm crappy at
actually shipping stuff, and I'm not sure if I believe that Camping is
a correct starting point for a new framework.
_______________________________________________
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Reply via email to