In the recent talk of rare canalia we have a first sighting of
"windless" with an attempted plural of "windlii".

Well this (pace Mr Stott) might be the emergence of a 6th or even 7th
declension based on a snippet of Virgil in his little known footnote
to the Georgics book IV
"De classibus canalibus" where he describes the early Roman canal
building of the fosdyke (Sp?) near Lindum Coloniae new town and in
particular the peculiar pieces of ironwork required to work the early
locks.

Personally I think it's a corruption of the simple masculine 2nd
declension noun "Vindlus -i" - a "winder" obviously a Germanic loan
word with the "ndl" intervocalic group often seen in early Old
Prussian/Yiddish texts.

-- 
------------------------------------
Dave J
In Springlike Extremadura
-----------------------------------

Reply via email to