Hi Michael Thanks for the considered comment. I think it's the sort of thing that can make a difference during the consultation.
Tweaking things bit by bit during the trial isn't helpful for anyone, but gathering views over a year, as the trial takes place, and having key dates when views are "due in" for cnsideration, gives a lot of opportunity . "BW nevers listens....." does not apply (but it annoys me when I hear it !). Eugene > Hi Eugene > > Thanks for the clarification. > > To put it bluntly, it seems that BW are allowing those with more money > than sense to jump over the waiting list and if I was on the waiting > list, then I would be more than a little annoyed with BW. > > Surely it would have been better, or even morally better, to freeze the > waiting list (not to add any more names) and then wait until all those > on the list had been satisfied and then run the trial. This may not be > an ideal approach but far less contentious than what has already been > formulated. > > -- > Regards > Michael Clarke > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: http://www.petroleumblownaparte.eu/ >
