Michael Clarke wrote:
>> To put it bluntly, it seems that BW are allowing those with more
>> money than sense to jump over the waiting list and if I was on the
>> waiting list, then I would be more than a little annoyed with BW.
>>
>> Surely it would have been better, or even morally better, to freeze
>> the waiting list (not to add any more names) and then wait until all
>> those on the list had been satisfied and then run the trial. This
>> may not be an ideal approach but far less contentious than what has
>> already been formulated.
eugenebastonbw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> Thanks for the considered comment. I think it's the sort of thing
> that can make a difference during the consultation.
>
> Tweaking things bit by bit during the trial isn't helpful for anyone,
> but gathering views over a year, as the trial takes place, and having
> key dates when views are "due in" for cnsideration, gives a lot of
> opportunity .
>
> "BW nevers listens....." does not apply (but it annoys me when I hear
> it !).
But after a year and once the trial has taken place, won't the damage
already have been done; won't the 'haves' already have jumped the queue over
the 'have-nots'?
Has there been any previous consultation on this? Surely Michael's point
would have been made then and should have been considered before the trial
by a listening BW, not afterwards when it is too late.
--
Bob
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
