On 3, Jun 2007, at 14:32, Steve Wood wrote: > If the argument is actually that a proportion of what is currently the > mooring fee should be part of the licence fee instead, so that everyone > (including all those who pay nothing to BW for their mooring, which is > a > lot more than just the CCs) pays more towards the upkeep of the system > as opposed to the upkeep of individual moorings then lets have that > debate instead...
I'm with you on this one Steve ! pay X to "exist" on BW water pay Y to cruise - the more you cruise the more you pay pay Z to moor - the more you moor the more you pay I would think X could be a small proportion of the total (X+Y+Z) and for someone who hardly cruises Y would be small and Z large. For something akin to a "continuous cruiser" (ie a continuous non-moorer) Z would be nil except for whatever develops as the honeypot nightly rate ! Time for another glass of sickly sweet german wine I think. Beeky
