Susan Burchett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As smoking is a legal activity I find it offensive that it is banned. I >think this is a grave infringement of civil liberties and I don't smoke. >Owners of establishments should be able to say if they wish to be smoking or >non smoking and then their staff and customers can choose which they >frequent. >Banning a legal activity is the start of a very slippery slope. >Sue nb Nackered Navvy
"Keens, Graham, VF UK - Technology \(RO\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Captain Beeky replied to Sue's posting about smoking with " ... I have a >basic discomfort about the ever increasing you must do this you must not >do that country we live in. " > >Hear! Hear! I also despair about living in a society where generations >of people appear to not know how to judge whether something is risky or >not because they have never had to make that call during their >childhood. Soon the Nanny state will have to mutate into the Orwellian >state in order to cope with the lack of empathy and respect that results >from children being brought up within today's 'ban everything to do with >discipline' society. > >Graham >Nb arantadaykeepsdepressionaway >www.jannock.org.uk It's later than (both of you) think. We already have screens/cams almost everywhere, with Big Brother on many of them. Adrian Adrian Stott 07956-299966
