On 14/10/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am writing up the notes on this matter for the inevitable future > reference, when the time comes. I maintain the view that regardless of the > facts, the TV licence chasers assume that all properties without licences > are evading the purchase of one. Perhaps quite a reasonable assumption if > a TV set is present on the premises - but nevertheless incorrect at this > location. > > Let's face it Staffy invited the inspector in to see that a non > functioning set was present. The inspector was only interested in the fact > that a set was present, functioning or not. > > I don't think Staffy is crazy, and neither does he ! > > Beeky > > For a slightly different approach see http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/letter-to-tv-licensing.html
John nine9feet who once went 3 years without a tv and accumulated over 20 letters from the TV Licensing people -- nine9feet lives! Latest links: http://www.pageflakes.com/nine9feet.pageflakes.ashx Add yours : http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Canals
