After serious thinking John wrote :
> Bruce wrote:
>
> I had a rant on the blog yesterday about the three bollards per
> narrow lock idiocy, which made me wonder if anyone has any clue why
> BW thought this was such a good idea. They are all over the Delph 9
> and Stourbridge 16, and seem to be spreading from there onto the
> Staffs and Worcs.
>
> (see http://nbsanity.blogspot.com/)
>
> I can't recall any serious account of the genesis of it - what's the
> point?
>
> I asked Jim Stirling (used to be BW Scotland Director but is now Technical 
> director of BW) why BW was installing what we thought were unnecessary 
> bollards on narrow locks (we had just done the Llangollen). His reply was 
> that they were there to help shorter boats which might surge back and 
> forwards in a lock - he mentioned GRP cruisers. It is a H & S issue 
> apparently.
>
> Ann 
>
> We have just cruised up the South Oxford and there are newly installed 
> bollards at each lock and are all of the cast metal type (most are covered 
> with brown sacking). 
Not here the haven't (Napton top lock) yet, there are 3 red crosses on 
the concrete




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to