I'll drink to that - in water as I am TT. One answer per reply. More and I skip that message as I have a one track (single steam) mind.
--- On Wed, 16/12/09, George Pearson <[email protected]> wrote: From: George Pearson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [canals-list] Re: proposed new posting rule. To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, 16 December, 2009, 19:09 On 16 Dec 2009 at 17:20, Julian Tether wrote: > What is worse for threading than Adrian's method, is those that just read a > message click reply change the subject and then delete the text and create a > message on an unrelated subject. It takes more time then creating a new > message..... ......... .... > > Can we have a rule about this please. Yes. Good point, since using "Reply" does (via the hidden message headers) attach the new message to the old, even though the new subject is completely different. - george [canals-list co-manager] www.canals.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
