On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:58:43 +0100, dave hearnden <[email protected]> wrote:
>Adrian, > >I actually find your comments fail to grasp a simple concept. > >Use it or lose it, Indeed. But my point is that the Slough branch has very little going for it, so if we *have* to lose any waterways it might well be on the list. Because I don't feel much desire to use it, I suppose I wouldn't feel too bad to lose it. Unless it becomes part of a through route to the Thames, of course. >It might be a surprise to you that I had been trying to get a I*A campaign >boat rally on the Slough Arm for 2011 I failed to achieve due to time. Go for it. If enough people want to preserve it, then of course it should be retained (and maintained). It's not that I have any philosophical opposition to the waterway. Adrian Adrian Stott Tel. UK (0)7956-299966
