On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:33 AM Kyle Larose <k...@agilicus.com> wrote: > > Also curious is that "User Equipment" is defined in Section 2.1, but not > > shortened to "UE" anywhere other than in Section 3.5. > > > > We should be consistent throughout the document. If it aids > readability, I have no problem changing it to UE. Do you think that > would help?
Actually since there's only "UE" present in the one section, I would simply expand it there so it matches the rest of the document. > > In Section 4.1, what's an "RA"? > > > > > > Router Advertisement (rfc4861). This section is discussing workflows > related to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-02, > which describes how router advertisements would be used in more > detail. > > I suppose using the full term here would help clarify, though there is > also an opportunity to reference rfc4861 -- I'm not sure whether > that's necessary, since presumably someone seeking further > clarification would read rfc7710bis, which references rfc4861. I'm > happy to add the reference if you think it's necessary. Either. I just meant the acronym is introduced but not defined anywhere. Even saying "RA (Router Advertisement)" would be an improvement, but a citation is also a great idea. -MSK _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
