Hi Robert, Thanks for the review. Responses inline.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 05:57, Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: No Objection > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I found this document easy to read, but have a few comments. > > I support the 3rd bullet of Ben's discuss. > > I was surprised by the diagram in section 2.6, since it seems to imply that > the > Provisioning Service kicks everything off, but I would have expected the User > equipment to initiate the flow, which is articulated in the first step of > section 4.1. Hence, I think that the diagram could be more clear if it also > showed the initial request from the client (as per the first step in 4.1). E.g. something like a "Join Network" request? I think that's reasonable. It's possible that the URI flows to the User Equipment unsolicited, but I don't think adding the request to the diagram precludes that. > > Finally, I note that this document makes no mention of OAM considerations. > Having some text covering these aspects would probably be beneficial. > I don't object to mentioning it, but I'm not sure it's within the scope of the WG to expand much more beyond that. Perhaps one of the chairs could comment? > Thanks! Kyle _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
