In General is it a best practice to use main sequence for some specific task?
I think we should always use Proxy service for those things and main sequence can be used as a default path for any undispatched message for a proxy service. And also I would like to see a proxy service is always as a web service. Then it should have a wsdl and client code should written by generating the code with that. thanks, Amila. On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]> wrote: > For e.g. see: > http://wso2.org/project/esb/java/3.0.1/docs/samples/qos_mediation_samples.html#Sample100 > > <http://wso2.org/project/esb/java/3.0.1/docs/samples/qos_mediation_samples.html#Sample100>It > takes about 10 minutes to read and understand the scenario and you still > remain doubtful if you got the thing right. For e.g. is this sample showing > security between client and ESB or ESB & back-end? > > Why not add a diagram each on the scenario being addressed?? > > Also, as discussed in the road-map discussion, all these samples also need > instructions on how to get them done with the UI. Which means, we cannot use > the same doc as from the Synapse docs. Need to have some screenshots on how > to pick the sec. policy etc. > > Also, I am not clear if it is a proxy service or the main sequence that we > are securing with this sample. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > Samisa Abeysinghe > VP Engineering > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com > http://wso2.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
