++1, for the execution On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Senaka Fernando <sen...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Sameera, Pradeep, > > +1, but X should probably be a name of a derivative/allotrope of Carbon > (like Diamond or Graphite) which makes our code names more meaningful. > > I really like the idea of having two-levels of dependencies and orbits > very much, which simplifies the effort of doing a carbon release and > sticking to that. Carbon must be just like the Linux kernel, and it can > have its own release schedule. > > Please also note that carbon should continue to have a concept of > service-stubs which can be reused by other components, and should also have > an integration area. > > Thanks, > Senaka. > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Pradeep Fernando <prad...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Carbon-dev mailing list >> Carbon-dev@wso2.org >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev >> >> > > > -- > *Senaka Fernando* > Product Manager - WSO2 Governance Registry; > Associate Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com* > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org > > E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com > **P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +94 77 322 1818 > Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando > > * > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > architect...@wso2.org > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Regards, Tharindu blog: http://mackiemathew.com/ M: +94777759908
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
