Sure. I will do my best.
Here are the things I will try out:
1. JBossCache 3.2.1.GA - Same setting as we are using in my company
currently. (No issues with this as it is proven)
2. JBossCache POJO 3.0.0.GA
- Setup POJO Cache
- POJO cache works through AOP and provides some benefits with fine
grained replication so find out its effect on memory & performance
3. Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL
- Currently facing serialization issue, resolve this (let's see how much
time this takes) and move forward
- Try "Distribution Mode" for replication (
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Clusteringmodes#distribution) - I am excited
about this (
http://infinispan.blogspot.com/2009/08/distribution-instead-of-buddy.html)
- Compare performance & memory usage with JBossCache 3.2.1.GA (and
optionally with JBossCache POJO 3.0.0.GA)
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Scott Battaglia
<[email protected]>wrote:
> We can make that as one of the last decisions. There is plenty of other
> stuff to work on right now :-). No set deadline yet. Its mostly dependent
> on my free time (and the papers I need to finish for school).
>
> I'd be extremely happy if you could provide us some insight into what
> direction to go with the JBoss stuff.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Mihir Patel <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> That's a good point. I haven't worked with POJO cache before but using it
>> shouldn't be a big issue. Let me look into that as well and I will get back
>> to you. BTW, what's the deadline for deciding JBossCache 3.2.1.GA or
>> JBossCache POJO Edition 3.0.0.GA or Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL? When do you
>> plan to release CAS 3.5?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Scott Battaglia <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm fine with sticking with JBoss Cache. I think its probably a good time
>>> to start looking at some of the more advanced features of it though (we
>>> basically didn't take advantage of anything like the POJO annotation stuff).
>>> Do you have any experience with that stuff?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Mihir Patel <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about supporting both? JBossCache 3.2.1.GA and Infinispan
>>>> 4.0.0.FINAL (or latest stable version of Infinispan before CAS 3.5
>>>> release).
>>>>
>>>> Check this <http://community.jboss.org/message/534484> user forum on
>>>> Infinispan, I have added the details on the issue I am seeing with using
>>>> Infinispan as our Ticket registry. I am looking into that
>>>> marshalling/unmarshalling issue as much as I can but it makes me think that
>>>> it is probably too early to think about moving to "only" Infinispan. It
>>>> would be a better choice to continue using JBossCache 3.2.1.GA (as it
>>>> is proven) while we work on Infinispan issue(s).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Scott Battaglia <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm investigating whether Infinispan is a better option for 3.5 since
>>>>> we're redoing the storage mechanisms anyway. Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Mihir Patel
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Scott & others,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we update JBossCache to its latest version 3.2.1GA? I am asking so
>>>>>> that I can go ahead and provide details of our JBossCache setup which
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> users can benefit to achieve High Availability.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am also trying to setup environment with Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL and
>>>>>> let you know once I have prooven working environment with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mihir
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>> --
>>
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
