Awesome, thanks!

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Mihir Patel <[email protected]>wrote:

> Sure. I will do my best.
>
> Here are the things I will try out:
>
> 1. JBossCache 3.2.1.GA - Same setting as we are using in my company
> currently. (No issues with this as it is proven)
> 2. JBossCache POJO 3.0.0.GA
>     - Setup POJO Cache
>     - POJO cache works through AOP and provides some benefits with fine
> grained replication so find out its effect on memory & performance
> 3. Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL
>     - Currently facing serialization issue, resolve this (let's see how
> much time this takes) and move forward
>     - Try "Distribution Mode" for replication (
> http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Clusteringmodes#distribution) - I am
> excited about this (
> http://infinispan.blogspot.com/2009/08/distribution-instead-of-buddy.html)
>     - Compare performance & memory usage with JBossCache 3.2.1.GA (and
> optionally with JBossCache POJO 3.0.0.GA)
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Scott Battaglia <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We can make that as one of the last decisions.  There is plenty of other
>> stuff to work on right now :-).  No set deadline yet.  Its mostly dependent
>> on my free time (and the papers I need to finish for school).
>>
>> I'd be extremely happy if you could provide us some insight into what
>> direction to go with the JBoss stuff.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Mihir Patel <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> That's a good point. I haven't worked with POJO cache before but using it
>>> shouldn't be a big issue. Let me look into that as well and I will get back
>>> to you. BTW, what's the deadline for deciding JBossCache 3.2.1.GA or
>>> JBossCache POJO Edition 3.0.0.GA or Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL? When do you
>>> plan to release CAS 3.5?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Scott Battaglia <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm fine with sticking with JBoss Cache. I think its probably a good
>>>> time to start looking at some of the more advanced features of it though 
>>>> (we
>>>> basically didn't take advantage of anything like the POJO annotation 
>>>> stuff).
>>>>  Do you have any experience with that stuff?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Mihir Patel 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What about supporting both? JBossCache 3.2.1.GA and Infinispan
>>>>> 4.0.0.FINAL (or latest stable version of Infinispan before CAS 3.5 
>>>>> release).
>>>>>
>>>>> Check this <http://community.jboss.org/message/534484> user forum on
>>>>> Infinispan, I have added the details on the issue I am seeing with using
>>>>> Infinispan as our Ticket registry. I am looking into that
>>>>> marshalling/unmarshalling issue as much as I can but it makes me think 
>>>>> that
>>>>> it is probably too early to think about moving to "only" Infinispan. It
>>>>> would be a better choice to continue using JBossCache 3.2.1.GA (as it
>>>>> is proven) while we work on Infinispan issue(s).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Scott Battaglia <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm investigating whether Infinispan is a better option for 3.5 since
>>>>>> we're redoing the storage mechanisms anyway.  Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Mihir Patel <[email protected]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Scott & others,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we update JBossCache to its latest version 3.2.1GA? I am asking
>>>>>>> so that I can go ahead and provide details of our JBossCache setup which
>>>>>>> other users can benefit to achieve High Availability.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also trying to setup environment with Infinispan 4.0.0.FINAL and
>>>>>>> let you know once I have prooven working environment with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Mihir
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>>>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to