On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Marvin Addison <marvin.addi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> <snip /> > > Supporting both RegEx and Ant in the way that has been described > > requires more work ... but I'm willing to live with it. > > There's consensus, then, on supporting both. I'm for it, Scott's for > it, and you can live with it. Beautiful. Also note that we can drop > Ant patterns in a future release if most deployers use regular > expressions exclusively at that time. > I don't know if I'm for or against dropping them completely. Spring Security supports both specifically for the reason that Ant patterns are less complex and good for certain use cases, while regular expressions can handle the more complex scenarios. Fortunately, I don't think we need to make the decision now. I'm thrilled though that we seem to have consensus on getting this in. Cheers, Scott > > > it's incumbent on > > the folks who like to do more to either commit to doing more or allow > > the other strategy to proceed. > > I'll have a pull for review by COB tomorrow. > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
