We use it production and development across a total if 6 independent CAS 
deployments with various permissions to each. While we could manage JSON 
files via Puppet, ideally the UI would remain.

On 06/09/2014 10:00 AM, Jérôme LELEU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've never used it in production, nor have Unicon (Bill's feedback). 
> Hence the "rarely used" and the idea that maybe we could deprecate the 
> management webapp and save a lot of work here. Some powerful tools 
> seem to be emerging as replacement (I'm thinking of the JSON 
> registries started by Unicon and MArvin...)
>
> Though, it's not a decision, it's a proposal and if the assumption is 
> false, I'm sure that people interested in this UI will manifest 
> themselves enough, so that we keep it...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jérôme LELEU
> Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com 
> <http://www.casinthecloud.com> | Twitter: @leleuj
> Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas <http://www.jasig.org/cas> | 
> Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org <http://www.pac4j.org>
>
>
> 2014-06-09 16:39 GMT+02:00 Scott Battaglia <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
>     How did we determine "rarely used" ?
>
>
>     On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         For deprecation, per our discussion on
>         https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/439, I'd like to propose to
>         deprecate the management UI which is pretty complex to
>         maintain to match all the capabilities provided by the CAS
>         server and which seems to be rarely used.
>         I admit that it seems to be a rather drastic choice.
>         Best regards,
>
>         Jérôme LELEU
>         Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com
>         <http://www.casinthecloud.com> | Twitter: @leleuj
>         Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas <http://www.jasig.org/cas>
>         | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org <http://www.pac4j.org>
>
>
>         2014-06-07 17:53 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
>             Thanks for clarification on the roadmap.
>
>             Notes follow:
>
>             @JPATicketRegistry:
>
>             I am not sure if it’s the most widely used one. I’d think
>             the default in-memory registry is the one that is used
>             most often and works quite well if one is not after an HA
>             deployment and is the least complex option. After all, it
>             requires you to do absolutely nothing. The JPA one is
>             attractive because it provides durable space specially
>             useful for remember-me, but in reality and my experience,
>             it is first and foremost evaluated by folks to implement
>             HA with CAS. Nonetheless, I think we can find and agree on
>             better and more robust alternatives. I don’t have any
>             particular options at hand at the moment, perhaps a NoSql
>             solution would work better and be easier to set up and
>             clean…perhaps an in-memory registry that is backed by
>             MongoDb, or something else…At the very least, I think we
>             should strongly encourage folks that the JPATicketRegistry
>             should not be considered for HA deployments.
>
>             @Github Issues:
>
>             So, we have to do a little bit of work to create some
>             appropriate tags that correspond to our existing JIRA
>             issue types, but that’s quite simple to do, takes very
>             little time and the process is in fact quite customizable.
>             Every issue can be assigned to a milestone, and may be
>             tagged with many other decorations that JIRA provides.
>             Issues can be assigned to developers, can have “Affects
>             Version” and “Fixed in Version” and many other tags that
>             we feel may be more relevant.
>
>             References:
>
>             https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-next-generation
>
>             https://help.github.com/articles/customizing-issue-labels
>
>             Again, it really feels like we are just using JIRA as a
>             task list but there is just a bit of disconnect. Not
>             everyone, I am not sure, is subscribed to all JIRA issues
>             that are reported; a separate system requires a separate
>             account which requires extra cleanup and maintenance.
>             Github issues can take care of all of this.
>
>             Now, there is a bit of downside, where we lose the ability
>             to create private issues. I am not sure how that may be
>             implemented, if it can at all.
>
>             @Downloads Link
>
>             I think the Jasig website needs to point to a place where
>             folks can download CAS. But that’s a one time
>             modification. We can simply point the link to the place
>             where binary downloads are available on Github, and people
>             can choose which version to download and adopt.
>
>             Reference: https://github.com/blog/1547-release-your-software
>
>             @Release Process
>
>             We definitely do need to take some action there. I have
>             considered gradle for the build and while it works fine, I
>             have not seen any significant improvements yet. Now, I
>             think the heart of the issue lies with the maven-release
>             plugin and various problems we have had with git and
>             platform types. We may want to look into BinTray and see
>             how that helps. It should sync with maven central, which
>             is what we really care about and does come with its own
>             set up of plugins that may work better. I am not sure yet,
>             but it seems like a viable option.
>
>             Reference: https://bintray.com/
>
>             *From:*Jérôme LELEU [mailto:[email protected]
>             <mailto:[email protected]>]
>             *Sent:* Thursday, June 05, 2014 3:06 AM
>             *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>             *Subject:* Re: [cas-dev] CAS 4.1.0
>
>             Hi,
>
>             2014-06-05 3:11 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed
>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
>             …oh, one more thing to consider:
>
>             -Rather than providing binary downloadable artifacts per
>             release on the jasig website, it seems like the release
>             engineer for a given CAS release has all the right
>             permissions and tools to take advantage of the Github’s
>             releases feature, where the binary artifact, cas-webapp as
>             well as release notes can directly be hosted and uploaded
>             there. The jasig website could then perhaps just include a
>             link to the latest release, or to the download area.
>
>             If you have to create a link in the Jasig web site, I'm
>             not sure to see the benefit: using the text editor for the
>             web site is a bit painful, either for just a link or a
>             more complete description...
>
>                 My objective really is to try and simplify the release
>                 process, by keeping code, docs, and artifacts all
>                 close in the same spot and seems like Github serves
>                 this need quite well for the time being. I imagine
>                 this would also be much easier for CAS users as well,
>                 where they get the code, docs, and the downloadable
>                 artifact and release notes (Just the piece that is
>                 uploaded to the jasig wiki that is) all from the same
>                 place.
>
>             I'm in line with your objective, but we didn't talk about
>             the worse part from my point of view: the Maven release
>             prepare and perform tasks...
>
>             Best regards,
>
>             -- 
>
>             Jérôme LELEU
>
>             Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com
>             <http://www.casinthecloud.com> | Twitter: @leleuj
>
>             Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas
>             <http://www.jasig.org/cas> | Creator of pac4j:
>             www.pac4j.org <http://www.pac4j.org>
>
>               
>
>             -- 
>
>             You are currently subscribed [email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>  as:[email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>             To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, 
> seehttp://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>             -- 
>             You are currently subscribed [email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>  as:[email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>             To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>             http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>
>         -- 
>         You are currently subscribed [email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>  as:[email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>         To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, 
> seehttp://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>
>     -- 
>     You are currently subscribed [email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>  as:[email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>     To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, 
> seehttp://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>
> -- 
> You are currently subscribed [email protected]  
> <mailto:[email protected]>  as: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev


-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to