I'll give my input (if it's helpful). I use Issues' "milestones" feature for 
marking versions my projects march towards. Works quite well. 

Best,
Dmitriy.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 15, 2014, at 4:43, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems to have worked because my mailbox has more than 170 new messages.
> 
> The only strange thing I saw is the labels: some are versions, some are 
> component types... I guess that there should only be "component types" as 
> "labels", shouldn't there?
> 
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Jérôme LELEU
> Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj
> Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org
> 
> 
> 2014-07-14 22:11 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]>:
>> I am working on a script to make the transfer happen. Few minor quirks to be 
>> worked yet, but so far, this is what would show up:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> https://github.com/mmoayyed/cas/issues?state=open
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Coloring of the labels needs to happen manually.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Scott Battaglia [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 3:10 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [cas-dev] CAS 4.1.0
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I don't have a strong preference if we aren't losing any functionality. 
>> 
>> On Jul 11, 2014 5:56 AM, "Jérôme LELEU" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We always value good opinion. I'm not very enthusiastic about migrating from 
>> JIRA to GH issues. I don't really see the gains compared to the efforts.
>> 
>> Though, it seems we can have the same features on both sides. So why not?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jérôme LELEU
>> 
>> Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj
>> 
>> Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 2014-07-10 16:29 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Kopylenko <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> I am personally totally onboard with the move to GH issues, but my voice 
>> doesn’t count ;-)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> D.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ًWhile we are making progress, I thought I'd revisit this topic and see 
>> where we stand, particularly on moving away from Jira and over to Github 
>> issues. I have got some time today and tomorrow to make the effort to move 
>> open JIRAs over and configure issue tracking. Is the majority onboard with 
>> the move, or are there other considerations we should take? 
>> 
>> From: "Misagh Moayyed" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 8:57:37 AM
>> Subject: RE: [cas-dev] CAS 4.1.0
>> 
>> Thanks for clarification on the roadmap.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Notes follow:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> @JPATicketRegistry:
>> 
>> I am not sure if it’s the most widely used one. I’d think the default 
>> in-memory registry is the one that is used most often and works quite well 
>> if one is not after an HA deployment and is the least complex option. After 
>> all, it requires you to do absolutely nothing. The JPA one is attractive 
>> because it provides durable space specially useful for remember-me, but in 
>> reality and my experience, it is first and foremost evaluated by folks to 
>> implement HA with CAS. Nonetheless, I think we can find and agree on better 
>> and more robust alternatives. I don’t have any particular options at hand at 
>> the moment, perhaps a NoSql solution would work better and be easier to set 
>> up and clean…perhaps an in-memory registry that is backed by MongoDb, or 
>> something else…At the very least, I think we should strongly encourage folks 
>> that the JPATicketRegistry should not be considered for HA deployments.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> @Github Issues:
>> 
>> So, we have to do a little bit of work to create some appropriate tags that 
>> correspond to our existing JIRA issue types, but that’s quite simple to do, 
>> takes very little time and the process is in fact quite customizable. Every 
>> issue can be assigned to a milestone, and may be tagged with many other 
>> decorations that JIRA provides. Issues can be assigned to developers, can 
>> have “Affects Version” and “Fixed in Version” and many other tags that we 
>> feel may be more relevant.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> References:
>> 
>> https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-next-generation
>> 
>> https://help.github.com/articles/customizing-issue-labels
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Again, it really feels like we are just using JIRA as a task list but there 
>> is just a bit of disconnect. Not everyone, I am not sure, is subscribed to 
>> all JIRA issues that are reported; a separate system requires a separate 
>> account which requires extra cleanup and maintenance. Github issues can take 
>> care of all of this.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Now, there is a bit of downside, where we lose the ability to create private 
>> issues. I am not sure how that may be implemented, if it can at all.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> @Downloads Link   
>> 
>> I think the Jasig website needs to point to a place where folks can download 
>> CAS. But that’s a one time modification. We can simply point the link to the 
>> place where binary downloads are available on Github, and people can choose 
>> which version to download and adopt.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Reference: https://github.com/blog/1547-release-your-software
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> @Release Process
>> 
>> We definitely do need to take some action there. I have considered gradle 
>> for the build and while it works fine, I have not seen any significant 
>> improvements yet. Now, I think the heart of the issue lies with the 
>> maven-release plugin and various problems we have had with git and platform 
>> types. We may want to look into BinTray and see how that helps. It should 
>> sync with maven central, which is what we really care about and does come 
>> with its own set up of plugins that may work better. I am not sure yet, but 
>> it seems like a viable option.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Reference: https://bintray.com/
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Jérôme LELEU [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 3:06 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [cas-dev] CAS 4.1.0
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 2014-06-05 3:11 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> …oh, one more thing to consider:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> -        Rather than providing binary downloadable artifacts per release on 
>> the jasig website, it seems like the release engineer for a given CAS 
>> release has all the right permissions and tools to take advantage of the 
>> Github’s releases feature, where the binary artifact, cas-webapp as well as 
>> release notes can directly be hosted and uploaded there. The jasig website 
>> could then perhaps just include a link to the latest release, or to the 
>> download area.
>> 
>> If you have to create a link in the Jasig web site, I'm not sure to see the 
>> benefit: using the text editor for the web site is a bit painful, either for 
>> just a link or a more complete description...
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> My objective really is to try and simplify the release process, by keeping 
>> code, docs, and artifacts all close in the same spot and seems like Github 
>> serves this need quite well for the time being. I imagine this would also be 
>> much easier for CAS users as well, where they get the code, docs, and the 
>> downloadable artifact and release notes (Just the piece that is uploaded to 
>> the jasig wiki that is) all from the same place.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I'm in line with your objective, but we didn't talk about the worse part 
>> from my point of view: the Maven release prepare and perform tasks...
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Jérôme LELEU
>> 
>> Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj
>> 
>> Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org
>> 
>>  
>> -- 
>>  
>>  
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> -- 
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>  
>> -- 
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>  -- 
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
> 
> -- 
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to