I agree. It would be a great idea to make this work.

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:21 AM, David Hatanian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Vipin,
>
>   I think this is a great move to share this with the community and help
> beginners in the process of learning CAS basics. To share your VM, you might
> want to take a look at Turnkey Linux <http://www.turnkeylinux.org/> which
> provides such VMs for different applications (not CAS, not yet), and maybe
> contribute yours to the project.
>
> *Cheers
>
> David Hatanian
> Consultant OCTO Technology
> **
> **59 avenue Fal Ould Oumeir*
> *Rabat Agdal*
> *GSM : (212) 6 62 16 66 95*
> *http://www.octo.com*
>
>
>
> 2011/4/16 Vipin Jain <[email protected]>
>
>>  I was working last night to create a prebuilt VM with all Open Source
>> stuff and i thought we can help all developers with this VM so that we dont
>> have go with the hassle of installing/configuring the base CAS
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> Please let me know your thoughts about this, so that we can have different
>> options as per developers requirement and also help the community.
>>
>> *This are the conponents i installed*
>> Ubuntu 10.10
>> OpenDJ
>> CAS 3.4.3
>> Apache 2.0.64
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andrew Petro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> I noticed this email and have forwarded it to cas-steer for discussion of
>>> what the CAS Steering Committee would consider. :)
>>>
>>> Without that discussion having happened, I'm not prepared to speak
>>> authoritatively to what additional strategic effort, coordination, calories
>>> the CAS Steering Committee might be willing to consider applying.
>>>
>>> I will however note that in some ways this is less a question of whom
>>> Jasig and cas-steer would consider working with, and more a matter of who
>>> would consider working with the CAS community.  CAS is free and open source
>>> software with a simple, well-documented protocol, an extensible modular
>>> implementation, and most importantly, a community of developers and
>>> participants with a justly-earned reputation for friendliness. When
>>> providers of SSO-as-a-service apply effort and engage with the CAS community
>>> to enhance the CAS support of their products and services, I'd expect they'd
>>> get supportive responses on the lists and elsewhere as most other comers
>>> have, and I'd expect they could be quite successful in CAS-integrating their
>>> products.
>>>
>>> I appreciate that's not quite what you asked, though.  Your question
>>> seems to go more to the strategic value to Jasig and to CAS in instigating
>>> this kind of support for the CAS protocol in these products and services.
>>>  It's a worthwhile strategic question, one I'll take up with the CAS
>>> Steering Committee, which doesn't preclude further discussion here as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks for bringing it up.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/29/2011 08:22 AM, Smith, Matthew J. wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Would JASIG or the CAS Steering Committee (or whomever is appropriate)
>>>> consider working with an existing authentication provider like
>>>> http://www.protectnetwork.org/ to offer the CAS protocol as an
>>>> additional authentication service?  ProtectNetwork today advertises
>>>> "Open standards compliant: Shibboleth, SAML, OpenID", so they are
>>>> already multi-protocol.
>>>>
>>>> - -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On 03/28/2011 03:55 PM, Marvin Addison wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking if we can start CAS on Cloud then it would very
>>>>>> easier for any developer to test and learn CAS.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds great except "cloud" is far too vague in terms of both
>>>>> provisioning and consumption. Practically speaking, who would
>>>>> host this offering?
>>>>>
>>>>> What features should this cloud offering provide? (I assume the
>>>>> cloud offering is strictly for demonstration and evaluation). The
>>>>> most common features needed by deployers:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Username/password authentication with LDAP backend -
>>>>> JpaTicketRegistry for ticket storage/registered services
>>>>> (Memcached comes in second by my very unofficial scorekeeping)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anything else?
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> - -- Matthew J. Smith
>>>> University of Connecticut UITS
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>
>>>> iEYEARECAAYFAk2RzyIACgkQGER0Au6g8xBUiACg5WVE+P09Cy25jPi5gIct2kW9
>>>> 1q0AoLKHCMaMprn2QWtKudbfP9zkDFoJ
>>>> =Ou5b
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to