On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > So I would argue that RTC is working for us, making sure reviews > actually happen, while git makes it mostly stay out of our way. I > _would_ be in favor of being less dogmatic about it > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-528 from earlier > today is a fine example) but in general I prefer not fixing what ain't > broke.
It was previously proposed that documentation be CTR. I would be in favor of this, and extending it to include scripts, licensing, and other project management materials. Michael
