2010/2/22 Peter Schüller <sc...@spotify.com>: >> #3 is, I think, the right answer. It make our system simpler and it >> makes the behavior in failure conditions more predictable and safe. > > Any thoughts on time-to-self-heal? My impression browsing the code, > and it seems to be confirmed by some wiki material, is that > anti-entropy is triggered only during full compactations. While hinted > handoff is never a guarantee, doing without it completely probably > increases the urgency of anti-entropy.
Maybe I mis-read the code, but I thought it was trigger for every compaction. -ryan > In general, what are people's thoughts on the appropriate mechanism to > gain confidence that the cluster as a whole is reasonably consistent? > In particular in relation to performing maintenance that may require > popping nodes in and out in some kind of rolling fashion. Are full > compactations expected to be something you would want to trigger > semi-regularly on production clusters by hand? > > -- > / Peter Schuller aka scode >
