If we do one more v2.x build (which I'd like to do) we'd rather limit breaking changes. For v3.0 we have some major changes in mind already, so that would not be a big problem as long as the change and migration path are properly documented (see breakingchanges.txt file in repository)

On 3/8/2010 9:16 PM, Simone Busoli wrote:
Sure, although that would probably be a breaking change.

2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    We'll be more than happy to discuss your ideas and patches with
    improvements, both for code and documentation.

    cheers,
    Krzysztof

    W dniu 8 marca 2010 21:12 użytkownik Simone Busoli
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> napisał:
    > Thanks, I was just trying to figure out its behavior. I think
    interceptor
    > selectors stuff can be improved, the API is not intuitive in my
    opinion, in
    > that you need to know what you need to return for it to behave
    correctly,
    > although it's documented in the xml docs but you usually don't
    see it since
    > you're not the client of the API.
    >
    > 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >>
    >> oh, and about docs, we added new wiki, that all docs will be
    migrated to.
    >> feel free to contribute :)
    >>
    >> http://stw.castleproject.org/Windsor.MainPage.ashx
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 3/8/2010 9:04 PM, Simone Busoli wrote:
    >>
    >> Is there documentation about what purpose they are used for or
    should I
    >> look at the source? I'd expect to put in HasInterceptors the
    logic to tell
    >> whether SelectInterceptors should be called or not, otherwise I
    have to
    >> duplicate the logic in both methods.
    >>
    >> 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >>>
    >>> That is correct. Both method are used at different spots and for
    >>> different purpose.
    >>>
    >>> If selector wants is not interested in particular component it
    should
    >>> return null from select method
    >>>
    >>> On 3/8/2010 6:54 PM, SimoneB wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> Should IModelInterceptorsSelector have its SelectInterceptors
    method
    >>>> called if HasInterceptors returns false?
    >>>>
    >>>> I'd expect not, but I'm experiencing the opposite.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >>> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >>> To post to this group, send email to
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    >>> For more options, visit this group at
    >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >>>
    >>
    >> --
    >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >> To post to this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    >> For more options, visit this group at
    >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >>
    >> --
    >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    >> "Castle Project Users" group.
    >> To post to this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    >> For more options, visit this group at
    >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups
    > "Castle Project Users" group.
    > To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    > For more options, visit this group at
    > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
    >

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle 
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to