Anyone? Can I go on with the proposed changes?

2010/3/9 Simone Busoli <[email protected]>

> So giving a look at the change log I noticed that there was a breaking
> change that was not reflected in the docs.
> The xml docs for SelectInterceptors say that
>
>         "If the selector is not interested in modifying the interceptors
> for this model, it
>         /// should return a null reference and the next selector in line
> would be executed (or the default
>         /// model.Interceptors)
>         /// If the selector return a non null value, this is the value that
> is used, and the model.Interectors are ignored, if this
>         /// is not the desirable behavior, you need to merge your
> interceptors with the ones in model.Interecptors yourself.
>         "
> That's not true since the change modified the behavior so that the
> model.Interceptors are always appended after all interceptors returned by
> all interceptor selectors, if any, so it's not true that by returning any
> interceptors from a selector then the default ones are discarded. This
> inconsistency can bring to duplicate interceptors being applied.
>
> In addition to this I think HasInterceptors is misleading, therefore I
> would suggest calling it before calling SelectInterceptors so that in case
> the first returns false then the second is not called. This is to centralize
> the logic to decide whether a model has interceptors or not in a single
> place.
>
> Finally, I'd suggest to make the SelectInterceptors contract clearer.
> Either modify the model.Interceptors collection or return something from the
> method, not both because it's hard to figure out where your interceptors end
> up WRT order, which is important.
>
> Ideas?
>
> 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>
>> yes, as well as the official documentation.
>>
>> W dniu 8 marca 2010 21:50 użytkownik Simone Busoli
>> <[email protected]> napisał:
>> > About the wiki, are there plans to move the contents in
>> > using.castleproject.org there?
>> >
>> > 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> If we do one more v2.x build (which I'd like to do) we'd rather limit
>> >> breaking changes.
>> >> For v3.0 we have some major changes in mind already, so that would not
>> be
>> >> a big problem as long as the change and migration path are properly
>> >> documented (see breakingchanges.txt file in repository)
>> >>
>> >> On 3/8/2010 9:16 PM, Simone Busoli wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Sure, although that would probably be a breaking change.
>> >>
>> >> 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>> >>>
>> >>> We'll be more than happy to discuss your ideas and patches with
>> >>> improvements, both for code and documentation.
>> >>>
>> >>> cheers,
>> >>> Krzysztof
>> >>>
>> >>> W dniu 8 marca 2010 21:12 użytkownik Simone Busoli
>> >>> <[email protected]> napisał:
>> >>> > Thanks, I was just trying to figure out its behavior. I think
>> >>> > interceptor
>> >>> > selectors stuff can be improved, the API is not intuitive in my
>> >>> > opinion, in
>> >>> > that you need to know what you need to return for it to behave
>> >>> > correctly,
>> >>> > although it's documented in the xml docs but you usually don't see
>> it
>> >>> > since
>> >>> > you're not the client of the API.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> oh, and about docs, we added new wiki, that all docs will be
>> migrated
>> >>> >> to.
>> >>> >> feel free to contribute :)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> http://stw.castleproject.org/Windsor.MainPage.ashx
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On 3/8/2010 9:04 PM, Simone Busoli wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Is there documentation about what purpose they are used for or
>> should
>> >>> >> I
>> >>> >> look at the source? I'd expect to put in HasInterceptors the logic
>> to
>> >>> >> tell
>> >>> >> whether SelectInterceptors should be called or not, otherwise I
>> have
>> >>> >> to
>> >>> >> duplicate the logic in both methods.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2010/3/8 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> That is correct. Both method are used at different spots and for
>> >>> >>> different purpose.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> If selector wants is not interested in particular component it
>> should
>> >>> >>> return null from select method
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On 3/8/2010 6:54 PM, SimoneB wrote:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Should IModelInterceptorsSelector have its SelectInterceptors
>> method
>> >>> >>>> called if HasInterceptors returns false?
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> I'd expect not, but I'm experiencing the opposite.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> --
>> >>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> >>> Groups
>> >>> >>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to
>> >>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> >>> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> >> Groups
>> >>> >> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >>> >> To post to this group, send email to
>> >>> >> [email protected].
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> >> Groups
>> >>> >> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >>> >> To post to this group, send email to
>> >>> >> [email protected].
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> > Groups
>> >>> > "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >>> > To post to this group, send email to
>> >>> > [email protected].
>> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "Castle Project Users" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to