Thanks, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking some known breaking change or something like that. I'll try to come up with a proper test for this.
Cheers, Mauricio 2012/3/22 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > I think it's a regression. > > Not sure exactly about the details what changed that caused it to stop > working and why none of our tests caught that. I'm pretty sure we have > tests that depend on the config, so I think it's unlikely it's not > populated when it's not there anymore. > > Please add that to YouTrack. > > @K > > > > > On 22/03/2012 7:37 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: > >> While trying to upgrade the Quartz.NET facility ( https://github.com/** >> castleprojectcontrib/**QuartzNetIntegration<https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration>) >> to Windsor 3, I found a breaking change I'm not sure how to overcome. >> >> Concretely, this test breaks: https://github.com/**castleprojectcontrib/* >> *QuartzNetIntegration/blob/**5fca07bb7252b18b06a77e88cecc11**81c39d1787/* >> *QuartzNetIntegration.Tests/**FacilityTests.cs#L31<https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration/blob/5fca07bb7252b18b06a77e88cecc1181c39d1787/QuartzNetIntegration.Tests/FacilityTests.cs#L31>because >> FacilityConfig is null. >> >> It looks as if the facility's FacilityConfig property isn't being >> populated from the ConfigurationStore. >> >> I received a patch with a workaround that simply skips the FacilityConfig >> and passes an IConfiguration explicitly : https://github.com/jochenjonc/* >> *QuartzNetIntegration/commit/**78cb6f191bf00a02f3ebccd17c0199**8882705c1f<https://github.com/jochenjonc/QuartzNetIntegration/commit/78cb6f191bf00a02f3ebccd17c01998882705c1f> >> But it's really a workaround... any ideas why I can't get the >> FacilityConfig to work? >> Of course, this used to work in Windsor 2.5. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Mauricio >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@** >> googlegroups.com <[email protected]>. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+** >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >> group/castle-project-users?hl=**en<http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en> >> . >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@** > googlegroups.com <[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+** > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/castle-project-users?hl=**en<http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
