Registered with failing test: http://issues.castleproject.org/issue/IOC-334
Cheers, Mauricio On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Mauricio Scheffer < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking some known > breaking change or something like that. > I'll try to come up with a proper test for this. > > Cheers, > Mauricio > > > 2012/3/22 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > >> I think it's a regression. >> >> Not sure exactly about the details what changed that caused it to stop >> working and why none of our tests caught that. I'm pretty sure we have >> tests that depend on the config, so I think it's unlikely it's not >> populated when it's not there anymore. >> >> Please add that to YouTrack. >> >> @K >> >> >> >> >> On 22/03/2012 7:37 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: >> >>> While trying to upgrade the Quartz.NET facility ( https://github.com/** >>> castleprojectcontrib/**QuartzNetIntegration<https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration>) >>> to Windsor 3, I found a breaking change I'm not sure how to overcome. >>> >>> Concretely, this test breaks: https://github.com/**castleprojectcontrib/ >>> **QuartzNetIntegration/blob/**5fca07bb7252b18b06a77e88cecc11** >>> 81c39d1787/**QuartzNetIntegration.Tests/**FacilityTests.cs#L31<https://github.com/castleprojectcontrib/QuartzNetIntegration/blob/5fca07bb7252b18b06a77e88cecc1181c39d1787/QuartzNetIntegration.Tests/FacilityTests.cs#L31>because >>> FacilityConfig is null. >>> >>> It looks as if the facility's FacilityConfig property isn't being >>> populated from the ConfigurationStore. >>> >>> I received a patch with a workaround that simply skips the >>> FacilityConfig and passes an IConfiguration explicitly : >>> https://github.com/jochenjonc/**QuartzNetIntegration/commit/** >>> 78cb6f191bf00a02f3ebccd17c0199**8882705c1f<https://github.com/jochenjonc/QuartzNetIntegration/commit/78cb6f191bf00a02f3ebccd17c01998882705c1f> >>> But it's really a workaround... any ideas why I can't get the >>> FacilityConfig to work? >>> Of course, this used to work in Windsor 2.5. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Mauricio >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@** >>> googlegroups.com <[email protected]>. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+** >>> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/castle-project-users?hl=**en<http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en> >>> . >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@** >> googlegroups.com <[email protected]>. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+** >> [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >> group/castle-project-users?hl=**en<http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en> >> . >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
