I know, and I might be barking up the wrong tree, but here's what I want:
I want to have the instance initialized by the time that I resolve it. If I 
never resolve it, it needs to be disposed somehow, when the container is 
disposed. How do I go about coding that? The initialization must happen on 
a different thread from where the container is initialized, because the 
initialization takes too long to wait for, but by the time I need the 
component there would have passed time and it would have had time to 
initialize completely.

On Thursday, 17 May 2012 11:43:28 UTC+2, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>
>  You're still not resolving it.
>
> @K
>
> On 17/05/2012 7:36 PM, Henrik wrote: 
>
> I hacked one idea together, but it's failing; probably because the kernel 
> is already on its way out the window.
>
> Updated gist: https://gist.github.com/2710007
>
> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 11:00:05 UTC+2, Henrik wrote: 
>>
>> Yeah, I know, it's grand that it doesn't if you don't initialize them 
>> like I do.
>>
>> But how do I make it touch my object, is the question? :)
>>
>> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 10:56:40 UTC+2, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: 
>>>
>>>  It works as expected.
>>>
>>> Windsor never touches your object.
>>>
>>> @K
>>>
>>> On 16/05/2012 10:34 PM, Henrik wrote: 
>>>
>>> Here: https://gist.github.com/2710007
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 15 May 2012 22:27:42 UTC+2, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>  I'm not sure I understand.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a failing test to demonstrate it?
>>>>
>>>> On 16/05/2012 6:06 AM, Henrik Feldt wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>  If it is resolved once, yes, but not otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The problem is the otherwise. How do I do then?
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>>>>  
>>>> *On Behalf Of *Krzysztof Kozmic
>>>> *Sent:* den 15 maj 2012 12:02
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Windsor w/ BackgroundFactoryMethod
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> if it's IDisposable it will get disposed
>>>>
>>>> On 13/05/2012 10:24 AM, Henrik Feldt wrote: 
>>>>
>>>> bump
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>>> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>>>>  
>>>> *On Behalf Of *Henrik
>>>> *Sent:* den 9 maj 2012 00:47
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Windsor w/ BackgroundFactoryMethod
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking to initialize a component on a background thread, so I 
>>>> hacked something together. It looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/2640092
>>>>
>>>> It works really nice, except that of course the component isn't being 
>>>> disposed unless something else that depends on it is resolved, meaning 
>>>> there's a live component needing disposing which isn't being disposed.
>>>>
>>>> Where would I jack into Windsor 3 to provide a piece of logic stating, 
>>>> that for this type of handler/component/burden (?) when the 
>>>> container/kernel is being disposed, also perform a resolve and then 
>>>> release 
>>>> call, for this component?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/GZa5mIdsbKgJ.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/cjyCuX8UGfgJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>   -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/OWZzvQz4ulcJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
>
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/1cGxiGW_4GEJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to