Hi,
we haven't experienced the issue since moving to Windsor 3.1 but i'm not on
a project anymore, so i can't say for sure if the problem is gone. That's
unfortunately all I can add.
K
On Friday, January 18, 2013 10:14:18 PM UTC+4, Swami Iyer wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We have similar issue and I am interested in understand what or how we can
> resolve the issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Swami
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:39:49 AM UTC-4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>>
>> ok
>>
>> keep us posted
>>
>> @K
>>
>>
>> On 15/05/2012 9:38 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've tried to isolate the problem really hard but without success, it
>> goes rogue totally unexpected. All I was able to get is that it happens
>> only at the proxy creation but other circumstances are unknown. I ended up
>> moving endpoints configuration to the code, we'll see how it goes now.
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> K
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:04:42 PM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> Could you try to isolate the issue? A standalone trivial app that you
>>> could share that exhibits the problem would really help us understand what
>>> the problem is so that we can fix it.
>>>
>>> At this point I don't really know what might be the cause or solution to
>>> it.
>>>
>>> @K
>>>
>>> On 11/05/2012 12:35 AM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Krzystof
>>>
>>> sorry for delay.
>>>
>>> Neither services nor any 'operations' are generic in our case.
>>>
>>> When issue happens, every call to every method of that particular
>>> service ends with the same failure. Other services work as usual. Until we
>>> restart AppPool. After that, everything works again for days/weeks.
>>>
>>> If you're saying it's a WCF problem we could try to stress-test it
>>> with tracing enabled but It won't be easy due to irregular nature of the
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> We'll also try to drop xml configuration. But apart from that I'm not
>>> sure what else we can do.
>>>
>>> K
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, May 6, 2012 3:19:23 AM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Konstantin
>>>>
>>>> Are there any generics involved? When the issue happens once, does it
>>>> keep happening everytime after that?
>>>>
>>>> The stack trace is quite misleading here. The exception comes from WCF
>>>> itself, and WCFFacility merely rethrows it (which erases original
>>>> callstack, unless we force it to preserve it (which requires calling
>>>> non-public API).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @K
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/05/2012 11:05 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We register our Wcf proxies as
>>>>
>>>> container.Register(Component.For(t).AsWcfClient(WcfEndpoint
>>>> .FromConfiguration("*"))
>>>>
>>>> Endpoints defined in web.config.
>>>>
>>>> Everything works great, but once in a while (a week +-) one of the
>>>> proxies stops working until AppPool is restarted. Before using WcfFacility
>>>> we used similar custom proxying using ChannelFactory building (new
>>>> ChannelFactory<T>("*")) without any problem I can recall.
>>>>
>>>> So the question is, as usual, what could be the source of the problem?
>>>> Perhaps it's a configuration issue (lifestyle required?).
>>>>
>>>> We use Core/Windsor 3.0.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> In logs we see something like this:
>>>>
>>>> System.NotSupportedException: Method VoteForDiscussion is not supported on
>>>> this proxy, this can happen if the method is not marked with
>>>> OperationContractAttribute or if the interface type is not marked with
>>>> ServiceContractAttribute.
>>>> at
>>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.<>c__DisplayClass1.<PerformInvocation>b__0(WcfInvocation
>>>> wcfInvocation) in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line
>>>> 53
>>>> at Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.WcfInvocation.Proceed() in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\WcfInvocation.cs:line
>>>> 44
>>>> at
>>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.RepairChannelPolicy.Apply(WcfInvocation
>>>> wcfInvocation) in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Policies\RepairChannelPolicy.cs:line
>>>> 31
>>>> at
>>>> Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.PerformInvocation(IInvocation
>>>> invocation, IWcfChannelHolder channelHolder, Action`1 action) in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line
>>>> 72
>>>> at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\8689a06309d1ab0b\src\Castle.Core\DynamicProxy\AbstractInvocation.cs:line
>>>> 170
>>>> at Castle.Proxies.IWcfChannelHolderProxy_1.VoteForDiscussion(Guid
>>>> discussion, Guid argument)
>>>> at Foo.Bar.Web.Specific.Discussions.DiscussionManager.Vote(Guid
>>>> discussionId, Guid argumentId, HttpContextBase context) in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Discussions\DiscussionManager.cs:line
>>>> 42
>>>> at Foo.Bar.Web.Controllers.DiscussionController.Vote(Guid discussionId,
>>>> Guid argumentId) in
>>>> c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web\Controllers\DiscussionController.cs:line
>>>> 53
>>>> at lambda_method(Closure , ControllerBase , Object[] )
>>>> at System.Web.Mvc.ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute(ControllerContext
>>>> controllerContext, IDictionary`2 parameters)
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod(ControllerContext
>>>> controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2
>>>> parameters)
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass15.<InvokeActionMethodWithFilters>b__12()
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodFilter(IActionFilter
>>>> filter, ActionExecutingContext preContext, Func`1 continuation)
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext
>>>> controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor,
>>>> IDictionary`2 parameters)
>>>> at
>>>> Foo.Bar.Web.Specific.Windsor.WindsorActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext
>>>> controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor,
>>>> IDictionary`2 parameters) in c:\Bu
>>>> ildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Windsor\WindsorActionInvoker.cs:line
>>>> 22
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeAction(ControllerContext
>>>> controllerContext, String actionName)
>>>> at System.Web.Mvc.Controller.ExecuteCore()
>>>> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.Execute(RequestContext requestContext)
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<>c__DisplayClass6.<>c__DisplayClassb.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5()
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncResultWrapper.<>c__DisplayClass1.<MakeVoidDelegate>b__0()
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.<>c__DisplayClasse.<EndProcessRequest>b__d()
>>>> at
>>>> System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
>>>> at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean&
>>>> completedSynchronously)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/LftLi19j86kJ.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/XBoOXTYGgTEJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Users" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/mCXG6kVlosAJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/7QVX2V9eNOUJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
