If you upgrade to v3.1 it already does that -- Krzysztof Kozmic
On Saturday, 19 January 2013 at 11:41 PM, Frédéric Legrain wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > You told that "The exception comes from WCF itself, and WCFFacility merely > rethrows it (which erases original callstack, unless we force it to preserve > it (which requires calling non-public API)." > How can one get the complete stack trace? > > Cheers, > > Frédéric > > > 2013/1/19 Konstantin Alexandroff <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> > > Hi, > > > > we haven't experienced the issue since moving to Windsor 3.1 but i'm not on > > a project anymore, so i can't say for sure if the problem is gone. That's > > unfortunately all I can add. > > > > K > > > > > > On Friday, January 18, 2013 10:14:18 PM UTC+4, Swami Iyer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > We have similar issue and I am interested in understand what or how we > > > can resolve the issue. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Swami > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:39:49 AM UTC-4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: > > > > ok > > > > > > > > keep us posted > > > > > > > > @K > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15/05/2012 9:38 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > > > I've tried to isolate the problem really hard but without success, it > > > > > goes rogue totally unexpected. All I was able to get is that it > > > > > happens only at the proxy creation but other circumstances are > > > > > unknown. I ended up moving endpoints configuration to the code, we'll > > > > > see how it goes now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > > > > > > > K > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:04:42 PM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: > > > > > > Howdy, > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you try to isolate the issue? A standalone trivial app that > > > > > > you could share that exhibits the problem would really help us > > > > > > understand what the problem is so that we can fix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point I don't really know what might be the cause or > > > > > > solution to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > @K > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/05/2012 12:35 AM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, Krzystof > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sorry for delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Neither services nor any 'operations' are generic in our case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When issue happens, every call to every method of that particular > > > > > > > service ends with the same failure. Other services work as usual. > > > > > > > Until we restart AppPool. After that, everything works again for > > > > > > > days/weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're saying it's a WCF problem we could try to stress-test > > > > > > > it with tracing enabled but It won't be easy due to irregular > > > > > > > nature of the situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We'll also try to drop xml configuration. But apart from that I'm > > > > > > > not sure what else we can do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > K > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, May 6, 2012 3:19:23 AM UTC+4, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any generics involved? When the issue happens once, > > > > > > > > does it keep happening everytime after that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The stack trace is quite misleading here. The exception comes > > > > > > > > from WCF itself, and WCFFacility merely rethrows it (which > > > > > > > > erases original callstack, unless we force it to preserve it > > > > > > > > (which requires calling non-public API). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @K > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/05/2012 11:05 PM, Konstantin Alexandroff wrote: > > > > > > > > > We register our Wcf proxies as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > container.Register(Component.For(t).AsWcfClient(WcfEndpoint.FromConfiguration("*")) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Endpoints defined in web.config (http://web.config). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything works great, but once in a while (a week +-) one > > > > > > > > > of the proxies stops working until AppPool is restarted. > > > > > > > > > Before using WcfFacility we used similar custom proxying > > > > > > > > > using ChannelFactory building (new ChannelFactory<T>("*")) > > > > > > > > > without any problem I can recall. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the question is, as usual, what could be the source of the > > > > > > > > > problem? Perhaps it's a configuration issue (lifestyle > > > > > > > > > required?). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We use Core/Windsor 3.0.0.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In logs we see something like this: > > > > > > > > > System.NotSupportedException: Method VoteForDiscussion is not > > > > > > > > > supported on this proxy, this can happen if the method is not > > > > > > > > > marked with OperationContractAttribute or if the interface > > > > > > > > > type is not marked with ServiceContractAttribute. at > > > > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.<>c__DisplayClass1.<PerformInvocation>b__0(WcfInvocation > > > > > > > > > wcfInvocation) in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 53 at > > > > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.WcfInvocation.Proceed() in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\WcfInvocation.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 44 at > > > > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.RepairChannelPolicy.Apply(WcfInvocation > > > > > > > > > wcfInvocation) in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Policies\RepairChannelPolicy.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 31 at > > > > > > > > > Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration.Proxy.WcfRemotingInterceptor.PerformInvocation(IInvocation > > > > > > > > > invocation, IWcfChannelHolder channelHolder, Action`1 > > > > > > > > > action) in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\9834359f44c23fee\src\Castle.Facilities.WcfIntegration\Client\Proxy\WcfRemotingInterceptor.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 72 at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\8689a06309d1ab0b\src\Castle.Core\DynamicProxy\AbstractInvocation.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 170 at > > > > > > > > > Castle.Proxies.IWcfChannelHolderProxy_1.VoteForDiscussion(Guid > > > > > > > > > discussion, Guid argument) at Foo.Bar.Web.Specific > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Specific).Discussions.DiscussionManager.Vote(Guid > > > > > > > > > discussionId, Guid argumentId, HttpContextBase context) in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Discussions\DiscussionManager.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 42 at Foo.Bar.Web.Controllers > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Controllers).DiscussionController.Vote(Guid > > > > > > > > > discussionId, Guid argumentId) in > > > > > > > > > c:\BuildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web\Controllers\DiscussionController.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 53 at lambda_method(Closure , ControllerBase , Object[] ) at > > > > > > > > > System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute(ControllerContext > > > > > > > > > controllerContext, IDictionary`2 parameters) at > > > > > > > > > System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod(ControllerContext > > > > > > > > > controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor, > > > > > > > > > IDictionary`2 parameters) at System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass15.<InvokeActionMethodWithFilters>b__12() > > > > > > > > > at System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodFilter(IActionFilter > > > > > > > > > filter, ActionExecutingContext preContext, Func`1 > > > > > > > > > continuation) at System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext > > > > > > > > > controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor > > > > > > > > > actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2 parameters) at > > > > > > > > > Foo.Bar.Web.Specific.Windsor > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Specific.Windsor).WindsorActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodWithFilters(ControllerContext > > > > > > > > > controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionDescriptor > > > > > > > > > actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2 parameters) in c:\Bu > > > > > > > > > ildAgent\work\397ad3340da6dda6\Sources\Bar-Web-Specific\Windsor\WindsorActionInvoker.cs:line > > > > > > > > > 22 at System.Web.Mvc > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc).ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeAction(ControllerContext > > > > > > > > > controllerContext, String actionName) at > > > > > > > > > System.Web.Mvc.Controller > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc.Controller).ExecuteCore() at > > > > > > > > > System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc.ControllerBase).Execute(RequestContext > > > > > > > > > requestContext) at System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc.MvcHandler).<>c__DisplayClass6.<>c__DisplayClassb.<BeginProcessRequest>b__5() > > > > > > > > > at System.Web.Mvc.Async > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc.Async).AsyncResultWrapper.<>c__DisplayClass1.<MakeVoidDelegate>b__0() > > > > > > > > > at System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.Mvc.MvcHandler).<>c__DisplayClasse.<EndProcessRequest>b__d() > > > > > > > > > at System.Web.HttpApplication > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.HttpApplication).CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.HttpApplication).IExecutionStep.Execute() at > > > > > > > > > System.Web.HttpApplication > > > > > > > > > (http://Web.HttpApplication).ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, > > > > > > > > > Boolean& completedSynchronously) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > > > > > > Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. > > > > > > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/LftLi19j86kJ. > > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > > > > Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. > > > > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/XBoOXTYGgTEJ. > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "Castle Project Users" group. > > > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/mCXG6kVlosAJ. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/7QVX2V9eNOUJ. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected]). > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > (mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]). > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
