Can you explain the "support for foreign keys in multi-field identities" bug please? I don't understand what do you mean by that? Maybe some code will make it clear.
Thanks in advance. Ricardo Arguello ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Plea for info on Castor JDO 0.9.4! ;-) > Thomas, > > can I just reconfirm that I actually read your email correctly. > > a) No new features will be accepted on the JDO side of things for the 0.9.4 > release. > b) Existing bugs will be fixed for the 0.9.4 release, including the bug > mentioned futher below (support for foreign keys in multi-field identities, > that is). > > Thanks > Werner > > Thomas Yip wrote: > > > I don't think we have timeframe for 0.9.4 yet. > > But, unless 0.9.4 release very late, I would guess there would > > have no major feature from now to 0.9.4 on the JDO side. > > > > Sorry, we're lacking of resource. > > > > Thomas > > > > -----Original Message----- > > >From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:52 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: [castor-dev] Plea for info on Castor JDO 0.9.4! ;-) > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I'm really, really keen (and I am sure others are too) to have a list of > > >key features that will appear in the next release of Castor JDO, and a > > >finger-in-the-air estimate of when the next release will be available. > > >Can anyone provide this information? Even a rough idea would be much > > >appreciated... > > > > > >More particularly, I'd be really keen to see an answer to the below > > >email I sent about three days ago to this mailing list as it poses a > > >serious risk to our project. > > > > > >Many thanks, > > >Werner Guttmann > > > > > >-------- Original Message -------- > > >Subject: [castor-dev] 1:m relations and multi-field identities > > >Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:18:13 +0000 > > >From: Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Organization: Morgan Stanley > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >can somebody please educate me on the subject of problems with > > >multi-field identities in 1:m relations where on of the identity fields > > >is a foreign key. As far as I remember, the situation is as follows: > > > > > >Castor does support 1:m relations, but it does not support 1:m relations > > >with multi-field identities where one of the fields is a foreign key. > > > > > >Is this statement correct, and if so, is there anybody who knows when > > >this missing feature will be supported. I do remember emails that > > >referred to the on-going refactoring being the main reason for this not > > >being implemented yet. Is this still correct, and if so, can anybody > > >provide an estimate on when this functionality will be available? > > > > > >Thanks > > >Werner Guttmann > > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------- > > >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------- > > >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
