See inline.
-----Original Message----- >From: Max Foxell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:58 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Plea for info on Castor JDO 0.9.4! ;-) > >Thomas, > >back in March of last year (Castor 0.9.2) the "using FK as part of a PK" was >identified as a high priority fix. As such, we've been working on the >assumption that this enhancement would make it into the 0.9.4 release. I am sorry. I gave the statement because I was assuming that I would remain as a full time Castor JDO developer at that point. >think it's important to give developers a clearer idea of what features are >likely to appear in a release and when they are likely to appear (even if >the projected dates are way into the future) You might already read my previous email. There is no planned feature for the coming release. If I get a few easy days in a row before the next release, I will take a look at the particular feature you mentioned, just because it is in high demand. But, I am given a tight schedule to run for right now. If a user submits a patch for that or for other feature, I would review it individually. Thomas >so that they can plan around >them. As far as I can tell you are the only developer working on Castor JDO >and you only work part time on it so I understand you are over stretched but >I think all that's required is a simple list of features to expect in the >next release. A clearer direction for Castor JDO would hopefully make it >more likely that others could help contribute to those features and ease the >work load for you. I apologise if this email sounds negative, it isn't meant >to. I think Castor JDO is a great piece of software and I'd love to see it >give commercial products such as Top Link a run for their money ;-). In my >experience a public statement of the direction for a product adds a real >momentum that would otherwise be missing. What do you/others think? > >Thanks, > Max > >Thomas Yip wrote: > >> >It is not a bug report. It is "enhancement" request. It is implemented. >> >And, probably would not until much later. >> >> I mean it is not implemented. Obviously, my finger goes slower than my >> brain, and so it skipped some words. :) >> >> Thomas >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: >> unsubscribe castor-dev > >----------------------------------------------------------- >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
