Good job Peter.

 

The interesting thing about racing is it always comes down to weight. Any
time you can make the boat lighter she accelerates faster. Adding fixed
ballast to trim the boat is usually a losing game because while you may add
a bit to the hull speed any skipper who gets you into a tack duel kicks your
tail.

 

Of course I'm glad there was never an OB option on a C270. Before moving to
an inboard and getting acclimated I was convinced an OB was more
maneuverable. Now I do close quarter's maneuvers just to watch other boat
owners start to scramble to my aid and then go a little jaw drop when Wing
Tip completes maneuvers they would never consider possible.   

 

Phil Agur  C270 LE  #184   s/v Wing Tip

Secretary/Treasurer     Call Sign WCW3485

IC27/270A                          MMSI 366901790 

 <http://www.catalina27.org/> www.catalina27.org    Vessel Doc# 1039809

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Race Sails & Ballast/IB v OB

 

OK

 

I'll bite.  Here's the nav arch answer to OB vs IB


For a catalina 27 at even keel at DWL:

The weight required to sink a catalina 1" (aka TP1") is approx 0.26 ltons,
or 600lbs
The moment required to change trim 1" is approximately 650 ft lbs
The increase in wetted surface for every 1" of immersion is 4.5 sq ft, or
about 3%
The LCF is 1.2ft aft of amidships, or slightly less than 10' forward of the
transom

an 80lb 9.9hp OMC on the transom will generate 1.2" of trim by the stern
a 245lb atomic 4 located 5.5ft forward of the transom will generate 2" of
trim by the stern and sink the boat about 0.25 " further than the OB

So in the end (no pun intended) the OB causes less "squatt" than the inboard
and saves on total weight and wetted surface.  Since the transom is still
out of the water at these loads there is no measurable difference in LWL.

As for ballast, the chain locker is about 13ft forward of the LCF, so if you
want to have a permanent offset to 300lbs of crew located in the cockpit
(about 6-7' aft of LCF) you would require about 150# to generate the
countervailing trimming moment.

OK, clearly it's a slow day

Happy Holidays to all

Peter Zahn
Snagglepuss
#2622


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:44 pm
Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Race Sails & Ballast/IB v OB

Oh man - Here we go again.  I'll take my outboard any day.

 

In a message dated 12/20/2007 10:16:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

In a message dated 12/20/2007 12:09:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

    This is all speculation, but I believe when Frank designed the hull, it
was for an outboard and a tiller. So the addition on a much heavier inboard
and wheel (the wheel, also moving you aft) will make the stern squat. This
is obviously not ideal, but IMO makes for a much nicer boat. Also, you can
add enough weight to the bow to nearly sink the thing, and the stern will
still squat at hull speed as it falls into the bow wave. I feel the best
option, if it bothers you, is to move all your "stuff" forward, including
the batteries, but never ADD weight to any boat unless it is a cargo ship.

 

Tommy,






  _____  


See AOL's top
<http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004>  rated
recipes and easy
<http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aoltop00030000000003>
ways to stay in shape for winter.

My inboard weighs 245 pounds and is at the fwd end of the cockpit. How much
does that 9.9 weigh hanging way back on the transom? Can you say Torque?
Most of the time, when the auto pilot isn't engaged, I steer from the fwd
side of the wheel. The only drawback to an IB is the drag from the prop. A
folding prop would cancel that. Plus I don't have to mix gas or have to
worry about the prop coming out of the water!

    Barking up the wrong tree! 

 

Ray Winkle 
5275
Knot Home
Sarah Creek
Gloucester Point, VA.






  _____  


See AOL's top
<http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004>  rated
recipes and easy
<http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aoltop00030000000003>
ways to stay in shape for winter.





  _____  

See AOL's top
<http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004>  rated
recipes and easy
<http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aoltop00030000000003>
ways to stay in shape for winter.

  _____  

More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail
<http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=ao
lcmp00050000000003> !

Reply via email to