On 02/05/2012 07:12 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 2/5/2012 8:37 AM, Kai Diefenbach wrote:
Why not? Packages, which are not hosted on PyPi suck.

This is a technical discussion list, not a flame list.
That comment is both wrong and unhelpful.

'suck' is not the right way to express the problem, and it's the original poster's choice to host somewhere else, but it can indeed be inconvenient to quite a few users of PyPI if a package is not hosted on PyPI.

This because setuptools (and thus, easy_install, pip, buildout) for better or for worse uses a "trawl the web" approach to find download links, and multiple sites to download from create multiple potential points of failure besides PyPI itself.

This makes setuptools work for a range of cases and that's nice, but it's also a drawback, because on a fairly regular basis I at least have had the issue that a package wasn't hosted on PyPI and that the site hosting the package was suddenly down or had changed, breaking the setuptools-based automatic download. If the package were hosted on PyPI I wouldn't have had this issue, as PyPI itself is actually tolerably reliable (especially with mirroring in place; but these external packages are also not mirrored).

Of course the response I'll undoubtedly get is that I should host these packages myself or include them in my version control system and all that. And yes, I can do this, and sometimes I do. But doing that is in this subjective user's opinion actually an inconvenience. Any 'pip' user that installs a package from PyPI that has dependencies listed in setup.py can run into this problem.

So the original poster could at least consider uploading their package on PyPI to lessen his complaint. Besides the web UI, they'll find handy tools available to help automate things, such as 'setup.py sdist upload' and for more power, zest.releaser. But of course they can choose not to do so at all too - that's the way things work [1].

Regards,

Martijn

[1] I suspect an alternate timeline in which setuptools had never done this web trawling and would only download from PyPI would have lead to a more pleasant situation for users, though I'm not sure: setuptools being able to download dependencies might've retarded adoption of setuptools instead.

_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Reply via email to