-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Stefan Krah wrote: > Martijn Faassen <[email protected]> wrote: >> original poster's choice to host somewhere else, but it can indeed >> be inconvenient to quite a few users of PyPI if a package is not >> hosted on PyPI. > > I don't see any inconvenience since bytereef.org has a comparable > uptime to python.org. Not an argument. It is in the interest of all serious Python developers that Python packages are maintained in a proper way on PyPI (documentation, hosting, metadata etc.). Having a package on a private server is often a single-point-of-failure and not acceptable for professional deployments. My point about this: if a person does not want to host its package on PyPi than it should stay away from PyPI. Package hygiene and a certain level of professional package repository is more important and personal reasons for not hosting packages on PyPI. - -aj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGUBAEBAgAGBQJPMDVgAAoJEADcfz7u4AZjgLULv0CxGU34t6C3N/XYW9U4OS1r tNWH5m5VEFJ8gqOkXrnzK2XldyNt4y1LeOAVoYtciuJt9PB02zBFobbGwS7OoKcZ V7cu23LQeo3RQG2NeQ5UTDcEBKioHDWTKayPFRokVcbwo+DRbPQzph7Q+51bfugz kcH248laGq9zx5W3tsuH0dDYPh/p5HQPwzGk3mM0dlqZi6Ztshe+DE1xLc+0Su3D Psx/4Ax7CYCUJUKUUT3ondzDdThmjq8iT5gCWhGDEAm6qEpt+EgP1dqT6Lv0tzek 9e2FM4d2aHhdxYfe9RfWkmu61PT42cCfvNSmihVFsCBbqQMEBKejdIbDNwNjWl9k D6Y4SOmJYpW0LL07IEHNmbj5ARaXUg+0fXoIgw4BDksu7WfDH7MZREEzm4Wqaaze ILHaLSyNAd1nivHe4q6QXe9Y8ZhAehTTPjCzCvZmcgQuRbu1Apxw4RKWSYfMGIFZ zjwEOrcd2rWPqu6CZ/zjAQoFefTACxs= =3DWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
