Check out https://blake2.net/ ; it is both faster and more secure than md5. md5 does have to go, no matter how secure it is in this particular application. SHA2 is the only choice that doesn't require a long explanation. When this came up a little less than a year ago we talked about maybe including the SHA2 hash in one of the link attributes <a href= something="hash"> for the benefit of old clients. _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Donald Stufft
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags PJ Eby
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags PJ Eby
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Donald Stufft
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Noah Kantrowitz
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Daniel Holth
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Christian Heimes
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Donald Stufft
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Christian Heimes
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Donald Stufft
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags M.-A. Lemburg
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Christian Heimes
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags Donald Stufft
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags PJ Eby
- Re: [Catalog-sig] hash tags holger krekel
