Hello
I chose TT for some reasons, including:
* The syntax is simple enough to have templates edited by web designers.
* It doesn't allow (unless you force it to) you to put Perl directly into the
template, thus making me (and my developers, especially ;-)) always prefer to
put the logic into the controller (that is, where it should stay).
* Most Catalyst users chose TT, so it's easier to find examples. Moreover, when
I write examples or tutorials (I'll soon or after ;-)) I'm sure that they can be
targeted to most of the Catalyst community.
* It's lightweight enough to be very usable also in CGI (non-Catalyst)
environments, and that's good as I'm maintaining some legacy applications which
actually use a mixture of TT and Petal.
Michele.
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
