On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:23:21AM +0300, vb wrote:
> >
> >There is absolutely no reason to use Prototype.
>
>
> The Prototype + Scriptaculous javascript framework is junk.
>
>
> "There is absolutely no reason to use"... Prototype + Scriptaculous
>
> It doesn't work very well, the syntax is terrible, it will break other
> >javascript on the page just by being included
>
>
> This is not true, for prototype.js (including "the syntax" wich is as it is
> in OO-javaScript...).
> I have a working application in which is used prototype.js, tinyMCE.js,
> tabber.js (from Patrick Fitzgerald) with Catalyst and TT. Many complex
> applications (and widgets) exists, based on prototype.js.
Complex applications can be written using shit tools.
It doesn't stop them being shit.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
