Fayland Lam wrote: > Matt S Trout wrote: >> No, it's awful. There's no reason at all for this to be a plugin. >> >> I'd suggest you make it a mixin for Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema >> instead. > but it depends on every request. it start at the sub prepare and end > before finalize_body. due to my limited knowledge, I'm not sure if > it's OK as a mixin for Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema
I got about 90% through composing the post that mst wrote, and decided against it because of the per-request requirement. However, just out of curiosity, why do you care about making it per-request? > that's right. but there is more than one way to do it. :) Careful with that. For every good way to do something, there are 1000 bad ways. For throw-away code, TMTOWTDI is fine, but if you want every DBIC user to use your code, do things the good way :) Regards, Jonathan Rockway
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
