On 6 Oct 2008, at 00:01, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Matt S Trout <dbix-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://perlbuzz.com/2008/10/whats-the-state-of-perl-web-frameworks.html
Shout out your support please, let's show the wider world that
we're -the-
real MVC option right now. And be honest - I don't think anybody
thinks the
docs are perfect or the learning curve's as shallow as it could be,
but that
doesn't mean Catalyst isn't still awesome.
Andy apparently just wanted to start a flamewar. This "article" is
idiotic, the reasons more so. I'm disappointed in perlbuzz in general
as it now holds the same amount of respect as getting my news from The
National Inquirer.
I'd encourage people to rather blog about finding the article to be in
poor taste, then post their success stories. Commenting here or on
that blog entry is going to be buried.
++ to this
Ignore the arsey blog post with a conversation that had no value as an
opinion of any sort. If someone were to do a frank and open blog post
on the state of MVCs and where Cat stands in that, that'd be cool. It
would be pointless to indicate the guy was being a provocative idiot.
Destructive arguments and comments are easy (ask his partner) we
should be constructive.
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
