* Ashley <a...@sedition.com> [2009-03-08 19:15]: > Well... the lack of regular array operations like push
Are we talking about the same language? https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference/Global_Objects/Array/push > the disparate and incompatible implementations of regular > expressions Have yet to run into any. Are you sure you’re trying to use only ECMAScript standard features? > some still current syntax disparities like trailing commas > or reserved keyword treatment Yes, IE 6 is old and backward. :-) > the errors constantly shutting down browsers Huh? > operators behaving differently. Again with the huh… > I suppose I get what you mean, the spec didn't suck, the > implementations did. But we were discussing usage, not design > theory. :) Actually, the spec does suck in various ways, but not too badly, and the implementations are reasonably consistent nowadays – at least if you exclude IE 6, which is largely in line with modern browsers but has a bunch of annoying quirks like the trailing comma stupidity. > ++ to the quoted for the use of cromulent. That was actually part of the reason I quoted it… :-) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/