On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Ronald J Kimball <rkimb...@pangeamedia.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, John M. Dlugosz <wxju46g...@snkmail.com> > wrote: >> On 3/7/2011 1:35 PM, Ashley Pond V apv-at-sedition.com |Catalyst/Allow to >> home| wrote: >>> >>> Using the fragment is probably a bad idea. It's not supported by all >>> servers so it can end up lost on the backend depending on your setup. >> >> I've never heard of a web server that didn't have fragments. I link to >> anchors all the time! > > No, really, that's meaningless. Fragments are handled by the user > agent, not by the server.
What Ronald said + the #fragment is not passed along in the available ENV with some servers and setups. In these cases it doesn't exist as far as the backend is concerned. If you rely on it for dispatch, you may get burned. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/