Cliff Schmidt mentioned the header thing in reply to my question. Not sure where it originated from. He was giving a 6 hour legal presentation (!!!) one day, which I didn't attend because of the bad case of ADD :-)

Regarding missing CLA's, looks like we don't have a solution now. Let's follow up on that later. BTW, looks like Andriy is the last person who've made big contributions and whose CLA we don't have. And he made an effort to send his CLA - so hopefully the ASF received it, just overlooked it somehow. So I still hope that this issue will resolve itself.

Andrus


On Jul 9, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:

Andrus Adamchik wrote:
...
2. Migrate to Apache package naming and license. I've heard some
conflicting information at ApacheCon Dublin that the new soon-to-be-
published Apache policy does not require the Apache license header in
the source files. This may simplify the task.

hmmm ... I wasn't in Dublin, but can think of two proposed policies that
might have been discussed.

The first is Cliff Schmidt's proposed third-party license policy here:

http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html

The second is Cliff Schmidt gave legal-discuss@ a heads up about a
proposed source file header change back in June [1]. I've been tracking
what needs to be done -- I think -- for Derby on DERBY-1377 [2], and
that issue has a bunch of pointers into the legal-discuss@ list which
might be helpful. But I'm still waiting for Cliff Schmidt to send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(I can't find an  earlier
message, I think from Jean, clarifying the procedure for the  code
contributed by people whom we couldn't track).

If it's the new source header policy I don't think it has much, if
anything, to do with obtaining ICLA's from cayenne contributors,
including the emeritus contributors. btw, the post mentioning emeritus
Cayenne contributors is at [3].

I've been watching OFBiz in the Incubator because they have a similar
situation. --Or at least I think it's OFBiz. I thought I saw recent
Incubator traffic posting which specific code was tied to a contributor they couldn't locate, but I'm not readily spotting it. I'll hunt it down
and post it when I find it.

 -jean

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/ 200606.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377
[3]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cayenne-dev/ 200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to